2025:JHHC:27388 --1-- A.B.A. No. 5209 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI A.B.A. No. 5209 of 2025 ---- Shiv Kumar Singh, aged about 25 years, son of Bnarsi Singh, resident of village – Sotam, PO – Hethpochra, PO and District – Latehar .... Petitioner -- Versus -- 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Savita Kumari, wife of Shiv Kumar Singh, daughter of Pradeep Singh, resident of village – Sotam, PO, PS and District – Latehar, presently residing at her father’s home at village – Parsai Saranatoli, PO – Parsai, PS and District - Latehar .... Opposite Parties ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI --- For the Petitioner :- Mr. Prashant Kr. Rahul, Advocate For the State :- Mr. Someshwar Roy, Advocate ---- 02/09.09.2025 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the learned counsel appearing for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Latehar P.S. Case No.61 of 2025, for the alleged offences registered under Sections 352, 351(3), 115(2), 85, 82, 89 and 126(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 3 and 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, pending in the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Latehar. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner happened to be the husband of the informant and he is working in Indian Army and he rarely comes to the hometown. He submits that the allegation of abortion of pregnancy is there against father-in-law and mother-in-law and they have been granted bail on surrender. 2025:JHHC:27388 --2-- A.B.A. No. 5209 of 2025 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer and submits that the petitioner is the husband and in view of that the anticipatory bail may kindly be rejected. 5. Considering that the petitioner is working in Indian Army and it has been pointed out that he is posted in Assam and it has been further pointed out that the petitioner rarely comes to the hometown and the allegation of abortion of pregnancy is there against father-in-law and mother-in-law and they have been granted bail on surrender. In the attending facts and circumstances of this case, I am inclined to provide anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the petitioner, above named, is hereby directed to surrender before the learned Court within three weeks from today, and in the event of his surrender/arrest, the petitioner, above named, shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand), with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Latehar in connection with Latehar P.S. Case No.61 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Sangam/