Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 25017 (ALL)

RAJNEESH KUMAR SHARMA v. STATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

WPIL/454/2025 · 2025-03-19

Anish Kumar Gupta, Manoj Kumar Gupta

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:41204-DB HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD (Sl. No.54) Court No. - 21 Case :- PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 454 of 2025 Petitioner :- Rajneesh Kumar Sharma Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vinod Shankar Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Harsh Vardhan Gupta Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Gupta,J. Hon'ble Anish Kumar Gupta,J. 1. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner, Sri Harsh Vardhan Gupta, learned counsel for respondent no.1 and Sri Rajiv Gupta, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for State respondent. 2. Though the petition is ostensibly filed in public interest, the petitioner has not made due disclosure as required by sub-rule (3- A) of Rule 1 of Chapter XXII of the Allahabad High Court Rules, 1952 which was amended in view of the judgement of the Supreme Court in State of Uttaranchal vs. Balwant Singh Chaufal and others, reported in 2010, AIR SCW 1029. 3. Hence, we decline to entertain the petition since we are not satisfied in regard to the bona fides and credentials of the petitioner. 4. The petition is, accordingly, dismissed with liberty to file a fresh petition after making required disclosures, if so advised. There shall be no order as to costs. Order Date :- 20.3.2025 Shubham Arya (Anish Kumar Gupta, J.) (Manoj Kumar Gupta, J.) Digitally signed by :- SHUBHAM ARYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad