M/S INDIAN POTASH LTD. v. M/S GREEN INDIA AND 2 ORS.
Crl.L.P./27/2025 · 2026-02-05
Sanjeev Kumar Sharma
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2501 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2501 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010112702025
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Crl.L.P./27/2025 M/S INDIAN POTASH LTD.
A CO. REG. UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT,2013, HAVING ITS REG. OFFICE AT SEETHAKATHI BUSINESS CENTRE, 1ST FLOOR, 684690, ANNA SALAI, POST BOX NO. 738, CHENNAI-600006 AND ONE OF ITS REGIONAL OFFICE AT SHIMA PLAZA, 3RD FLOOR, BLOCK C, ULUBARI CHARIALI, G. S.
ROAD, GUWAHATI-782007, REP. BY ITS DEPUTY REGIONAL MANAGER. VERSUS M/S GREEN INDIA AND 2 ORS.
STATION RAOD (NEAR RAILWAY GATE), KARIMGANJ, ASSAM, PIN-788710, REP. BY ITS PROORIETOR MRS. SAHANARA BEGOM CHOUDHURY.
2:SAHANARA BEGOM CHOUDHURY PROPRIETOR M/S. GREEN INDIA HAVING ITS OFFICE AT STATION ROAD NEAR RAILWAY GATE P/S. SRIBHUMI DIST. SRIBHUMI ASSAM PIN-788710 ALSO RESIDENT OF BATARASHI P/O. TILLABAZAR P/S SRIBHUMI DIST. SRIBHUMI.
3:SAHABUL ISLAM CHOUDHURY MANAGER-CUM-AUTHORISED PERSON OF M/S. GREEN INDIA HAVING ITS OFFICE AT STATION ROAD NEAR RAILWAY GATE P/S. SRIBHUMI DIST. SRIBHUMI ASSAM PIN-788710
Page No.# 2/3 ALSO RESIDENT OF BATARASHI P/O. TILLABAZAR P/S SRIBHUMI DIST. SRIBHUMI Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M GOGOI, MR. N DEKA Advocate for the Respondent : MRS. R S DEURI (R-2,3), U BHARADWAJ(R-2,3),MS A DAS(R- 2,3),MR. T DEURI(R-2,3) Linked Case : ST.Rev./0/0 M/S INDIAN POTASH LTD ASSAM VERSUS M/S GREEN INDIA ASSAM ------------ Advocate for : MOINA GOGOI Advocate for : appearing for M/S GREEN INDIA
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA
ORDER Date : 06.02. 2026 Heard Mr. N. Deka, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. T. Deuri,
learned counsel for respondent Nos. 2 and 3. It is submitted that the applicant/ appellant intends to approach the court of the learned Sessions Judge, Kamrup (Metro), Guwahati by way of an appeal in view of the decision of the Hon’ble Apex Court, in the case of Celestium
Page No.# 3/3 Financial Vs. A. Gnanasekaran Etc. reported in 2025 SCC Online SC
1320. The prayer is allowed. As the question of limitation is concerned, it is provided that as prayed for by the learned counsel for applicant/ appellant and as agreed to by the learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 2 and 3 that in the event, the appellant approaches before the learned court below within a period of 10 (ten) days from today, the question of limitation shall not arise. It is ordered accordingly. The petition stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant