- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:15461 CRP No. 165 of 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 165 OF 2017 BETWEEN: APPAJIGOWDA S/O BOREGOWDA AGED 67 YEARS R/O CHANNASANDRA VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI MADDUR TALUK-571 428 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. PRAMOD R., & SRI. RAGHU R., ADVOCATES) AND: 1. SMT KALAVATHI W/O K SHIVALINGAIAH AGED 56 YEARS 2. SRI ANILKUMAR C S S/O K SHIVALINGAIAH AGED 39 YEARS 3. SRI MAHADEVA C S S/O K SHIVALINGAIAH AGED 37 YEARS 4. C S PAVITHRA D/O K SHIVALINGAIAH AGED 79 YEARS Digitally signed by JUANITA THEJESWINI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:15461 CRP No. 165 of 2017 R/O CHANNASANDRA VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI, MADDUR TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT-571 428 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. NAVEEN CHANDRA N., ADVOCATE) THIS CRP IS FILED UNDER SEC.115 OF CPC., 1908 AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 25.03.2017 PASSED IN EX.NO.30/2002 ON THE FILE OF LEARNED SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, MADDUR HOLDING THAT THE DECREE HOLDER IS HEREBY DIRECTING TO RECEIVE THE AMOUNTS DEPOSITED BY THE JUDGMENT DEBTOR ON 28.07.1999, 03.09.2002 AND 20.09.2002 AND TO RECOVER THE BALANCE AMOUNT OF RS.9,797 FOR WHICH HE IS ENTITLED AS PER THE ABOVE MEMO OF CALCULATION AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER On the previous occasion this Court had recorded the submissions of the learned Counsel for the petitioner that he has filed a memo of retirement and he has returned the file to the party. This Court directed that unless alternative arrangement is made - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:15461 CRP No. 165 of 2017 and the petitioner is represented, the memo of retirement cannot be accepted. The matter was adjourned to ensure that alternative arrangement is made. 2. Learned Counsel contends that he has tried to contact the petitioner and inform the petitioner regarding the memo of retirement filed by the petitioner and he has been informed of the next date of hearing. There is no alternative arrangement made by the petitioner. 3. Consequently, the Civil Revision Petition stands dismissed. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE DL CT: JL