Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 25005 (BOM)

JAYRAJ RAVINDRA SARWADIKAR v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND OTHERS

WP/9537/2023 · 2025-02-06

Shri Mangesh S Patil, Shri Prafulla S Khubalkar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

911 WP NO. 9537 OF 2023.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 9537 OF 2023 JAYRAJ RAVINDRA SARWADIKAR VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND OTHERS … Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. S. V. Warad h/f. Mr. Kedar Warad AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 : Mr. A. V. Lavte Advocate for Respondent No. 4 : Mr. S. S. Thombre Advocate for Respondent No. 5 : Mr. Girish L. Awale … CORAM : MANGESH S. PATIL & PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR , JJ. DATE : 06.02.2025 PER COURT : . We have heard both the sides. 2. The petitioner is seeking appointment on compassionate ground. It is being pointed out that respondent No. 3 – Education Officer has already addressed a communication to respondent No. 5 – Headmaster. 3. Suffice for the purpose of absorption that it would be for the management to consider the request on its own merits and in accordance with the policy, if any applicable to the fact situation. 1/2 2025:BHC-AUG:3433-DB 911 WP NO. 9537 OF 2023.odt Since the decision is yet to be taken by the management on the application of the petitioner, irrespective of the difficulties being faced by the management, it will have to take some decision either favourable or otherwise on the petitioner’s application. 4. With this limited scope at this juncture, the writ petition is disposed of, directing respondent No. 4 to consider the petitioner’s application on its own merits and in accordance with the applicable policy. The decision shall be taken as expeditiously as possible and in any case, within six (06) weeks, under the communication to the petitioner. ( PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, J.) (MANGESH S. PATIL, J.) jhs/ 2/2