2025:JHHC:27958 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI ABA No.5310 of 2025 1) Bikash Kumar Yadav, aged about 28 years, son of Tulsi Yadav, resident of village- Ward No.-2, Gujhandi, P.O.- Gajhandi, P.S.-Telaiya, District- Koderma; 2) Sujeet Kumar @ Sujit Kumar, aged about 21 years, son of Manoj Yadav, resident of village Ward No. 2, Jarga, P.O.-Gujhandi, P.S.- Jhumri Telaiya, District- Koderma; 3) Ajit Kumar, aged about 18 years, son of Manoj Yadav, resident of village- Ward No. 2, Jarga, P.O.- Gujhandi, P.S.- Jhumri Telaiya, District- Koderma; 4) Rohit Yadav @ Rohit Kumar, aged about 20 years, son of Sanjay Yadav, resident of village- Ward No.-4, Inderwa Basti, P.O.- Jhumri Telaiya, P.S.- Telaiya, District- Koderma; 5) Sudhir Kumar, aged about 19 years, son of Amrit Yadav, resident of village- Ward No. 2, Jarga, P.O.- Gujhandi, P.S.-Jhumri Telaiya, District- Koderma; 6) Pradeep Kumar Yadav, aged about 32 years, son of Amrit Yadav, resident of village- Ward No.- 4, Moriyama Kurha, P.O. & P.S.- Jhumri Telaiya, District- Koderma; 7) Mukesh Kumar @ Mukesh Yadav, aged about 30 years, son of Tulsi Yadav, resident of village- Ward No.-2, Gujhandi, P.O.-Gajhandi, P.S.- Telaiya, District- Koderma. …. Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opp. Party -------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Randhir Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Bishambhar Shastri, A.P.P. ------ 2/12.09.2025 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of Petitioners and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State. 2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Telaiya P.S. Case No. 122 of 2025, for offence registered under sections 115(2), 117(2), 118(1), 126(2), 127(2), 303(2) and 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, pending in the court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Koderma. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that there are general and omnibus allegations against the petitioners and the 2025:JHHC:27958 2 only allegation is that the informant has lost the hearing from ear. He submits the petitioners have got no criminal antecedents as disclosed in para 14. 4. Learned counsel for the State opposed the prayer and submits assault is there. 5. In view of the above and considering that the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent and there are general and omnibus allegations, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 6. Accordingly, the petitioners above named are directed to surrender before the learned Court within three weeks from the date of receipt of the order and on the event of their surrender / arrest, they shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty-Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount of each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Koderma, in connection with Telaiya P.S. Case No. 122 of 2025, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. 7. This Anticipatory Bail Application is accordingly allowed and disposed of. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) R.Kumar