Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2500 (AP)

VAJRALA SRINIVASA REDDY v. SRI SHASHIBHUSHAN KUMAR

CC/43/2025 · 2025-08-28

B Krishna Mohan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010004052025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN CONTEMPT CASE NO: 43/2025 Between: 1. VAJRALA SRINIVASA REDDY, S/O VENKATA REDDY, AGED 46 YEARS. CONTRACTOR, R/O. D.NO.2-21, LAKSHMIPURAM VILLAGE, KAREMPUDI MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT (NOW PALNADU). ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI SHASHIBHUSHAN KUMAR, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR, PRI. SECRETARY FINANCE AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH A.P. SECRETARIATE BUILDING, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI. 3. SRI Y CHINNA SUBBA RAYUDU, THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PRI DIVISION, NARASARAOPET, GUNTUR DISTRICT (NOW PALNADU). 4. SRI KATRAVATH KASHYA NAIK, THE PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, KAREMPUDI VILLAGE AND MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT (NOW PALNADU). ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to may be pleased to punish the respondents for willfully and wantonly not implementing the orders of the Honble High Court passed in 2 HBKM,J C.C.No.43 of 2025 W.P.No. 17102 of 2024 dt.18-09-2024 under Sec. 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. MANIKANTA THOTA Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. T S RAYALU 2. Mattegunta.Sudhir,Standing Counsel For Z.P.Ps,M.P.Ps,Gram Panchayats The Court made the following: 3 HBKM,J C.C.No.43 of 2025 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.KRISHNA MOHAN CONTEMPT CASE NO: 43 of 2025 ORDER:- The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order under contempt has already been complied with. 2. In view of the same, no further orders are necessary in this Contempt Case. 3. Accordingly, this Contempt Case is closed. Interim order, if any, deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN Dt: 29.08.2025 sj 4 HBKM,J C.C.No.43 of 2025 110 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.KRISHNA MOHAN CONTEMPT CASE NO: 43 of 2025 Dt: 29.08.2025 sj