Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010353492018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH MONDAY ,THE TENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: Between: M. Jagadeeswara Rao State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. P RAJKUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) The Court made the following:
ORDER:-
The instant Writ Petition is filed India for the following relief:
“to issue a Writ of Mandamus in discontinuing the services of the Petitioner as Outsourcing Computer Operator without notice or affording opportunity as highly illegal, arbitrary, violative of principles of natural justice and issue consequential directions to the Respondents to re Operator or in any suitable job b 05.02.2018 and pass such other orders”.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY ,THE TENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 16869 OF 2018 AND State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: Counsel for the Respondent(S):
GP FOR REVENUE (AP) The Court made the following: Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: to issue a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in discontinuing the services of the Petitioner as Outsourcing Computer tor without notice or affording opportunity as highly illegal, arbitrary, violative of principles of natural justice and issue consequential directions to the Respondents to re-engage the Petitioner as Outsourcing Computer Operator or in any suitable job by considering the Representation dated and pass such other orders”.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3396]
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA ...PETITIONER ...RESPONDENT(S) under Article 226 of the Constitution of declaring the action of the Respondents in discontinuing the services of the Petitioner as Outsourcing Computer tor without notice or affording opportunity as highly illegal, arbitrary, violative of principles of natural justice and issue consequential directions to engage the Petitioner as Outsourcing Computer y considering the Representation dated
2. Heard Sri P. Raj Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue for the respondents.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the Writ Petition may be disposed of giving a direction to the respondents to reconsider the representation dated 05.02.2018.
4. In the light of the submissions referred supra, the Writ Petition is
disposed of, with a direction to the respondent authorities are directed to reconsider the representation and take appropriate decision, according to governing rules and law. There shall be no order as to costs.
5. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, in this Writ Petition, shall stand closed.
_________________________________________ DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 10.03.2025 KK