APHC010353352025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 18156/2025 Between: 1. KALAVAKURI SRI LAKSHMI,, W/O. SRINIVASULU, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/O. KAMMAVARIPALLI, RANGASAMUDRAM VILLAGE, PORUMAMILLA MANDAL Y.S.R. KADAPA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPLE SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KANIGIRI, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 4. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR, PAMURU, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, CHANDRASEKHARA PURAM POLICE STATION, CHANDRASHEKHARA PURAM, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 6. SANGISETTY SRINIVASULU, S/O. CHIRRAIAH, AGED ABOUT NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, R/O. CHANDRASEKHARA PURAM VILLAGE AND MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 7. SANGISETTY RAMANAIAH, S/O. CHIRRAIAH, AGED ABOUT NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, R/O. CHANDRASEKHARA PURAM 2 VILLAGE AND MANDAL PRAKASAM DISTRICT 8. SANGISETTY PEDDA TIRUPATAIAH, S/O. CHIRRAIAH, AGED ABOUT NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, R/O. CHANDRASEKHARA PURAM VILLAGE AND MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 9. SANGISETTY CHINNA TIRUPATAIAH, S/O. CHIRRAIAH, AGED ABOUT NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, R/O. CHANDRASEKHARA PURAM VILLAGE AND MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to issue writ, order or directions more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent Nos. 3 to 5 in interfering with the civil matters in respect of petitioners land in Sy. No.133-13, to an extent of Ac. 0.35 Chandrashekhara Puram Village and Mandal,cents, situated at Prakasam District as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and violation of principles of natural justice and also apart from violative of Articles 14, 16, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere with the petitioners land in Sy. No. 133-13, to anextent of Ac. 0.35 cents, situated at Chandrashekhara Puram village and mandal, Prakasam District IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the respondents not to interfere with the petitioner's land in Sy. No. 1 SS I'S, to an extent of Ac. 0.S5 cents, situated at Chandra Shekhar Puram Village and Mandal, Prakasam District pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KAPPERA PAVAN KALYAN Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 3 The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer: “….to issue writ, order or directions more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent Nos. 3 to 5 in interfering with the civil matters in respect of petitioners land in Sy. No.133- 13, to an extent of Ac. 0.35 Chandrashekhara Puram Village and Mandal,cents, situated at Prakasam District as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and violation of principles of natural justice and also apart from violative of Articles 14, 16, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere with the petitioners land in Sy. No. 133-13, to anextent of Ac. 0.35 cents, situated at Chandrashekhara Puram village and mandal, Prakasam District.…” 2. Heard Sri K.Pavan Kalyan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri V.Farook, Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the police are interfering in the civil disputes. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader on written instructions would submit that basing on the complaint made by the 7th respondent, the petitioner is called to the police station for preliminary enquiry and no crime is registered against the petitioner. 4. Recording the same, this Writ Petition is disposed of. However the police are directed not to interfere in the civil dispute. There shall be no order as to costs. 4 As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATAJYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 25.07.2025 MH 5 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATAJYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 100 WRIT PETITION NO: 18156/2025 Dt.25.07.2025 MH 6