Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:28954] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 4392/2025
1. Rahul Son Of Jaikam, Resident Of Village Gulpada, Police Station Sikari, District Deeg (Raj.)
2. Jaikam Son Of Niwaja, Resident Of Village Gulpada, Police Station Sikari, District Deeg (Raj.)
3. Mubeena Wife Of Jaikam, Resident Of Village Gulpada, Police Station Sikari, District Deeg (Raj.)
4. Saddam Son Of Jaikam, Resident Of Village Gulpada, Police Station Sikari, District Deeg (Raj.)
5. Sabir Son Of Jaikam, Resident Of Village Gulpada, Police Station Sikari, District Deeg (Raj.)
6. Ansara Daughter Of Jaikam, Resident Of Village Gulpada, Police Station Sikari, District Deeg (Raj.)
7. Imrana Daughter Of Jaikam, Resident Of Village Gulpada, Police Station Sikari, District Deeg (Raj.) ----Petitioners Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, through Public Prosecutor
2. Fajruddin @ Fajju Son Of Munsi, Resident Of Village Thalchana, Police Station Jurhera, District Deeg (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mukesh Kumar Saini, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. M.S. Shekhawat, PP Mr. Rishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Judgment 30/07/2025
1. Accused-petitioners have filed this petition seeking directions of quashing of FIR No.0075/2025, registered at Police Station Sikari, District Deeg for the offences under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 85, 316(2), 189(2) of BNS.
[2025:RJ-JP:28954] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-4392/2025]
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that two sisters were married in the same family with two real brothers. It is submitted that after six years of marriage in a fit of rage, victim (now-deceased) had swallowed acid. It is submitted that the victim's father had filed the impugned complaint due to political pressure and the present petition is filed for quashing of the same and prior to the registration of the FIR, there were no complaint regarding domestic violence and otherwise.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the petition. It is submitted that death has occurred in the present matter under dubious circumstances and the matter needs to be investigated under the supervision of Superintendent of Police concerned.
4. In light of the submissions of learned Public Prosecutor, taking note of the allegations leveled in the FIR and the nature of offence, this Court deems it proper to dispose of the present petition with a direction to the Superintendent of Police concerned to investigate the matter in a fair, expeditious and transparent manner, after considering the representations of the concerned parties.
5. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed.
(SAMEER JAIN),J CHANDAN /81