Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 24995 (AP)

M/s. Sundeep Ravindra Engineers and Contractors v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/20846/2024 · 2025-09-23

Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010353902024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 20846 OF 2024 Between: 1. M/s. Sundeep Ravindra Engineers and Contractors, Plot No. 16, Sri Krishna Nagar, DCCB Colony Extension, Srikakulam. Rep.by its Managing Partner K Ravindra Reddy. 2. K.Ravindra Reddy,, Aged 55 years, Occ Contractor, R/o. Plot No. 16, Sri Krishna Nagar, DCCB Colony Extension, Srikakulam. ...Petitioners AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, Rep. by its Principal Secretary Roads and Buildings (R and B) Department Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Thullur Mandal, Guntur District. 2. State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary Finance Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Thullur Mandal, Guntur District. 3. The Chief Engineer R and B NH and CRF, New R and B Building, M.G.Road, Opp Indira Gandhi Municipal Stadium, Vijayawada. 4. The Superintending Engineer, R and B Circle, Vizianagaram, Vizianagaram District. 5. The Executive Engineer, R and B Division, Parvathipuram, Vizianagaram District. ...Respondents 2 Counsel for the Petitioners: K NARSI REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR ROADS BUILDINGS The Court made the following ORAL ORDER: Heard Sri K. Diwakar Reddy, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri K. Narsi Reddy, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner and Sri Shaik Abdul Rasheed, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Roads & Buildings, Transport and Labour. 2. Learned Counsel for the Respondents submits that the Respondents have made the payment. Learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner sought a pass over in the morning sessions to seek instructions from his Client. As per the instructions of his Client, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner submits that the amounts have been received and no further consideration is necessary. 3. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No Order as to Costs. 4. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt: 24.09.2025 JKS 3 76 HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION No. 20846 OF 2024 24.09.2025 JKS