- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:23716 WP No. 12413 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.12413 OF 2025 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. G. VENKATESH AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, S/O LATE VENKATARAVANAPPA, R/AT CHOWDESHWARI BHEEDI, 1ST BLOCK, BYALYA POST, PURUVARA HOBLI, MADUGIRI TALUK-572132. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. R.P.SOMASHEKHARAIAH, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. NARAYANA SWAMY K B., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, M.S. BUILDING, BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. THE JOINT DIRECTOR OF REGIONAL LAND RECORDS, BENGALURU DIVISION, K.R. CIRCLE, BENGALURU - 560 002. Digitally signed by SHARMA ANAND CHAYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:23716 WP No. 12413 of 2025 3. THE TECHNICAL ASSISTANT TO THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR AND EX-OFFICIO DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS, TUMKURU DISTRICT, TUMKURU - 672101. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, MADHUGIRI TALUK, MADHUGIRI-572132. 5. THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS, MADHUGIRI TALUK, MADHUGIRI, TUMKURU DISTRICT - 572101. 6. SRI. K. NANJEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS, S/O LATE KAPPANNA, R/AT CHOWDESHWARI BHEEDI, 1ST BLOCK, BYALYA POST, PURUVARA HOBLI, MADUGIRI TALUK-572132. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SIDDHARTH BABURAO, AGA FOR R1 TO R5) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2 IN REVISION PETITION NO.JDRLR/REVISION (TU)36/2024-25 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2 JOINT DIRECTOR OF REGIONAL LAND RECORDS, DATED 10.03.2025 - AS ANNEXURE-A. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:23716 WP No. 12413 of 2025 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER 1. Sri. Siddharth Baburao, learned Additional Government Advocate accepts notice for respondent Nos.1 to 5. 2. The petitioner herein is assailing the order dated 10.03.2025 (Annexure-A) passed by respondent No.2. In this regard, in view of the provision contained under Section 49(g) of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964, petitioner has to approach the competent authority. 3. In that view of the matter, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Writ Petition is disposed of reserving liberty to the petitioner to approach competent authority as stated above, for redressal of his grievances. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE sac List No.: 1 Sl No.: 45