Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:JHHC:28190
--1-- A.B.A. No. 5341 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI
A.B.A. No. 5341 of 2025
---- Md. Ansh @ Anas Alam, aged about 19 years, son of Jawed Alam, resident of village – Chope, PO – Murup, PS and District – Latehar
.... Petitioner -- Versus --
The State of Jharkhand
.... Opposite Party
----
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
---
For the Petitioner :- Mr. Jitendra Shankar Singh, Advocate
For the State
:- Mrs. Lily Sahay, Advocate
---- 02/15.09.2025 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the learned counsel appearing for the State.
2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Chandwa P.S. Case No.152 of 2025 for the alleged offences registered under Sections 126(2), 115 and 132 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, pending in the Court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Latehar.
3.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the FIR has been registered against unknown and the petitioner happened to be the student of B.A. Part II. He submits that the allegations are made that in the restricted root some of the motorcyclists have tried to enter and on the stoppage by the police the scuffle took place. He further submits that the false allegations are made of assault by the petitioner upon one of the constable and thereafter in the reinstatement the informant has taken the name of
2025:JHHC:28190
--2-- A.B.A. No. 5341 of 2025
the petitioner. He submits that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent as disclosed in paragraph No.10 of the petition.
4.
Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer and submits that the allegations are there of slapping to one of the constable, who was discharging his duty.
5. Considering that the petitioner is a student of B.A. Part II and the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent as disclosed in paragraph No.10 of the petition and even the FIR was not registered against the petitioner and in the reinstatement the informant has taken the name of the petitioner and further from the impugned order it transpires that notice under Section 35(3) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 has been issued to the petitioner and in that view of the matter the petitioner is directed to surrender before the learned Court within two weeks and the learned Court shall release the petitioner on such terms and conditions or the sureties as the learned Court may deem fit and proper.
(Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated 15.09.2025 Sangam/