\ Y APHC010352602025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) I THURSDAY,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JULy I TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 180?.-^ OF onon SATTI Between: M. Rama Krishnam Niadu, S/o Ex-Army. R/o. D.No. 4-1125/3D. Gayathri District. Kondappa Naidu, Aged about 66 years, Occ Nagar Colony, Greamspet, Chittoor ...PETITIONER AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary Revenue, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Andhra Pradesh. 2. The District Collector, Rayachoti, to Annamayya District. District. 3. The Joint Collector, Rayachoti Annamayya 4. The Tahsildar, Rayachoti Mandal Annamayya District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution Circumstances stated i pleased to issue the nature of Writ of Mandamus of India praying that in the in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court an appropriate Writ, Order direction may be more particularly one in action of respondent No. 3 in issuing the . 17-02-2025 and 09-04-2025 for repeated Notices, dated 03-01-2025, cancellation of the alleged fake DKT Pattas pertaining to the land that is no way related to the petitioner In an extant of an Ac.2.60 Cents In Sy No 374/1 of Pemmadapalli Village Fields, Rayachoti Mandal, Annamayya District , and y 1 harassing me by interfering with the petitioner personal life and liberty asking the petitioner to appear before him thereby threating the petitioner with dire consequences as arbitrary, illegal, principal of Natural Justice apart from being violate of the constitution and fundamental rights guaranteed to the petitioner under article 14, 19 of the constitution of India and consequently Set-aside the Notices, dated 03-01-2025, 17-02-2025 and 09- 04-2025 on my behalf. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in pursuance of Notices, dated 03-01-2025, 17-02-2025 and 09-04-2025 on petitioner behalf pending disposal of the above Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: M/s. S. PARINEETA Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following order: colorable exercise of power, voilative and 21 APHC010352602025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] THURSDAY,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 18023/2025 Between; 1.M RAMA KRISHNAM NIADU, S/0 KONDAPPA NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, OCC EX- ARMY, R/0. D.NO. 4-1125/3D, GAYATHRI NAGAR COLONY, GREAMSPET, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND PRINCIPAL 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY TO REVENUE, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2.THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, RAYACHOTI, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. 3.THE JOINT COLLECTOR, , RAYACHOTI ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. 4.THE TAHSILDAR, RAYACHOTI MANDAL ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT{S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus action of respondent No. 3 in issuing the repeated Notices, dated 03-01-2025, 17-02- 2025 and 09-04-2025 for cancellation of the alleged fake DKT Pattas pertaining to the land that is no way related to the petitioner in an extant of an Ac.2.60 Cents in Sy.No. 374/1 of Pemmadapalli Village Fields, Rayachoti Mandal, Annamayya District, and harassing me by interfering with the petitioner personal life and liberty asking the petitioner to appear before him thereby threating the petitioner with dire 2 consequences as arbitrary, illegal, colorable exercise of power, voilative principal of Natural Justice apart from being violate of the constitution and fundamental rights guaranteed to the petitioner under article 14, 19, and 21 of the constitution of India consequently Set-aside the Notices, dated 03-01- 2025, 17-02-2025 and 09- 04-2025 on my behalf and pass such lA NO: 1 OF 202.5 Petition under Section 151 CPC . praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in pursuance of Notices, dated 03-01-2025, 17- 02-2025 and 09-04-2025 on petitioner behalf pending disposal of the above Writ Petition and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.S PARINEETA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following ORDER: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue for the respondents 1 to 4. 2. Challenging the notices issued by Ref.No.E1/48/2025 dated 03.01.2025, 17.02.2025 and of cancellation of fake DKT patta/ROR entries for the land Ac.2-60 cents in Sy.No.374/1 of Pemmadapalli Village of Rayachoty Mandal, Annamayya District, the above writ petition has been filed. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the Ex-service man has granted D-form patta in respect of an extent of Ac. 1-00 cents in Sy.No.364-12A, Ac.1-20 cents in Sy.No.364-11, Ac.0-12 cents Sy.No.376, Ac.1-00 in Sy.No.364-1 A, Ac.1-66 cents in Sy.No.364-12, Ac.0-16 cents in Sy.No.364-16, Ac.0-26 cents in Sy.No.374-3, Ac.0-17 cents in Sy.No.382 and Ac.0-37 cents in Sy.No.264-10 total Asc.5-94 cents vide DKT patta No.38(a)/1414, dated 25.10.2024. The petitioner has nothing to do with rd the 3 respondent vide 09.04.2025 in respect to an extent of petitioner, an in 3 the survey number in 374/1. However, the notices referred to supra were issued to the petitioner, calling upon him to attend the hearing on 06.01.2025. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner submitted an explanation dated 11.01.2025 (Ex.P.2) to the 4'^ respondent- Tahsildar. 4. When the Court posed a question to the learned counsel for the petitioner whether the petitioner submitted any explanation to the Joint Collector, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that an explanation dated 11.01.2025 was marked to the Joint Collector; however, the counsel could not produce any proof. 5. 6. Learned Assistant Government Pleader on instructions would submit that the aforementioned notices were issued to the petitioner to submit an explanation by the 3'^'^ respondent; however, no explanation has been submitted. In reply, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner will submit an explanation to the Joint Collector for the aforementioned notices within two (2) weeks. 7. Given the facts and circumstances of the case, the Writ Petition is disposed of at the admission stage with the consent of learned counsel on either side giving liberty to the petitioner to submit explanation to the Joint Collector-3'^'^ respondent in respect of the aforementioned notices within two (2) weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. Thereafter, the learned 3'^^ respondent shall consider the same and pass necessary orders strictly per law as expeditiously as possible. No order as to costs. 8. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. Sd./- V.DIWAKAR DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTIO To, 1. The Principal Secretary to Revenue, State of Andhra Pradesh, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Andhra Pradesh. % 2. The District Collector, Rayachoti 3. The Joint Collector, Rayachoti Annamayya 4. The Tahsildar, Rayachoti Mandal 5. One CC to M/s. S. Parineeta, Advocate [OPUC] 6. Two CCS to GP for Revenue, High Court of Andhra 7. Two CD Copies. Annamayya District. District. Annamayya District. Pradesh [OUT] ssb HIGH COURT DATED; 17/07/2025 ORDER WP No.18023 OF 2025 F '(*2 »3SfP ^ S . ^ Ournnt s«ciion . % ^TCHEOjI^ DISPOSING OF THE W.P. AT THE STAGE ADMISSION WITHOUT COSTS OF (