Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 24983 (AP)

SYED KHADAR MOHIDDIN @ BABU v. Syed Habibunnisa

CRP/1729/2025 · 2025-08-06

Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010353722025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1729/2025 Between: 1. SYED KHADAR MOHIDDIN @ BABU, S/O. DASTHAGIRI BASHA, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/O. D.NO. 37-1-160(64), 5TH LANE, ISLAMPET, ONGOLE TOWN, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SYED HABIBUNNISA, W/O. DASTHAGIRI BASBA, AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, OCC HOUSEWIFE, R/O. D.NO. 37-1- 160(64), 5TH LANE, ISLAMPET, ONGOLE TOWN, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 2. SYED DASTHAGIRI BASHA, (DIED) 3. SYED AMEER, S/O. DASTHAGIRI BASHA, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, R/O. D.NO. 37-1-160(64), 5TH LANE, ISLAMPET, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 4. SYED ABDUL RAHIMAN, , S/O. DASTHAGIRI, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/O. D.NO. 37-1-160(64), 5TH LANE, ISLAMPET, ONGOLE TOWN, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. (RR. 3 AND 4 ARE NOT NECESSARY PARTIES TO THE C.R.P AS THE PETITIONER IS NOT SEEKING ANY RELIEF AGAINST THEM) ...RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to aggrieved by the order dated 12.03.2025 passed in E.P.No.45 of 2024 in O.S. No. 166 of 2012 on the file of Judge, Family Court-cum-VIII Additional District and Sessions Judge, Prakasam District, Ongole, this C.R.P. is filed IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to condone the delay of 21 days in 2 filing the Civil Revision Petition against the order dated 12.03.2025 passed in E.P. No. 45 of 2024 in O.S. No. 166 of 2012 on the file of Judge, Family Court-cum-VIII Additional District & Sessions Judge,, Prakasam District, Ongolein the interest of justice and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to dispense with filing of the Copy of E.P. No. 45 of 2024 in O.S. No. 166 of 2012 on the file of Judge, Family Court-cum- VIII Additional Districts Sessions Judge, Prakasam District, Ongole and pass IA NO: 3 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to suspend the operation of the order dated 12.03.2025 passed in E.P. No. 45 of 2024 in O.S. No. 166 of 2012 on the file of Judge, Family Court-cum-VIII Additional District, &. Sessions Judge, Prakasam District, Ongole and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. A VARALAKSHMI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. A.SAI ROHIT The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 1729 of 2025 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the cause in the revision petition does not survive and it has rendered infructuous. Learned counsel endorsed the same on the bundle. Recording the submission of the learned counsel, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date : 07.08.2025 SPP 4 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.1729 of 2025 Date : 07.08.2025 SPP