Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 24982 (AP)

M.Ramesh v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/23479/2020 · 2025-08-31

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010353132020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY,THE FIRST DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 23479/2020 Between: 1. M.RAMESH, S/O M.NARAYANAPPA, AGE 43 YEARS, OCC CONSTRUCTION WORKER, R/O 6-17, PULAKUNTA , CHIYYEDU , ANANTAPUR DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, , REP.BY IT'S PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ANANTAPUR, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT 3. THE SUB DIVISIONAL POLICE OFFICER, ANANTAPUR, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, BUKKARAYASAN-IDRAM POLICE STATION, ANATAPUR DISTRICT 5. D VENKATA RAMUDU, S/O VENKATA RAMUDU, AGE 55 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O 5/54, VIDHYARANYA NAGAR, ANANTAPUR, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT 6. D NARENDRA, S/O VENKATA RAMUDU, AGE 25 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O 5/54, VIDHYARANYA NAGAR, ANANTAPUR, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT 7. D LAKSHMI KANTHAMMA, W/O VENKATA RARNTIDU, AGE 52 2 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O 5/54, VIDHYARANYA NAGAR, ANANTAPUR, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT 8. ASHOK, S/O FATHERS NAME NOT KNOWN TO PETITIONER, AGE 50 YEARS, OCC FIELD OFFICER R/O STATE BANK OF INDIA, OLD TOWN, ANANTAPUR, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the inaction on the part of Respondent no.3 in investigating the case for tiling charge sheet, consequent arrest of Accused Respondents 5 to S in Crime No.220 of 2020 on the file of Bukkaraya Samudram Police Station, Anantapur District as illegal and arbitrary and consequently direct the Respondent no.3 to set the law in motion by examining the prosecution witnesses for filing Charge Sheet and consequent arrest of Respondents 5 to 8 the Accused in Crime No.220 of 2020 on the file of Bukkaraya Samudram Police Station, Anantapur District and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the Respondent no.3 to set the law in motion by examining the prosecution witnesses for filing charge sheet in Crime No.220 of 2020 on the file of Bukkaraya Samudram Police Station, Anantapur District consequent arrest of Accused Respondents 5 to 8 and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. N CHANDRA SEKHAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 3 The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “....to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the inaction on the part of Respondent no.3 in investigating the case for filing charge sheet, consequent arrest of Accused Respondents 5 to 8 in Crime No.220 of 2020 on the file of Bukkaraya Samudram Police Station, Anantapur District as illegal and arbitrary and consequently direct the Respondent no.3 to set the law in motion by examining the prosecution witnesses for filing Charge Sheet and consequent arrest of Respondents 5 to 8 the Accused in Crime No.220 of 2020 on the file of Bukkaraya Samudram Police Station, Anantapur District and to pass...” 2. Heard Sri N.Chandra Sekhar Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri V.Farook, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the police are not filing charge sheet in Crime No.220 of 2020 on the file of Bukkaraya Samudram Police Station, Anantapur District. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader would submit that the charge sheet is already filed in this matter. 5. Recording the same, this writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:01.09.2025 MH 4 5 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 260 W.P.No.23479 of 2020 Dt.01.09.2025 MH