Sl.No. 33 Court No. 35 G.S.Das 23.06.2025 WPA 11602 of 2025 Himangshu Majumder -Vs- The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Sandipan Maity Mr. Nobiul Islam … for the Petitioner(s) Mr. Jayanta Samanta, ld. Jr. Govt. Adv. Ms. Indumouli Banerjee … for the State-respondent(s) The petitioner is aggrieved by the fact that he provided shelter to the private respondent nos. 4 and 5 who subsequently refused to vacate the property when the petitioner demanded the same. Additionally, it has been submitted that the private respondent nos. 4 and 5 threatened the petitioner of dire consequences. The petitioner furnished information to the Inspector-in-charge of Berhampore Police Station as also the superior officers of the police authorities. Learned advocate for the State is present. I have heard learned advocate for the petitioner as also that of the State. Having considered the nature of the dispute, I am of the view that the petitioner will approach the regular criminal court under Section 175(3) of the BNSS. The learned Court will assess and ascertain, and thereafter, decide whether a case for investigation is made out or not. With the aforesaid observations, WPA 11602 of 2025 is disposed of. Pending application(s), if any, is also disposed of. Parties to act on a server copy of this order duly collected from the official website of the Hon’ble High Court, Calcutta. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)