Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 24981 (AP)

Smt Jayamma v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/16476/2018 · 2025-07-16

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010352432018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 16476/2018 Between: 1. SMT JAYAMMA, W/O. MAREDDY (LATE) , AGE. 80 YEARS, OCC. HOUSE WIFE, R/O. NALL KLUVA(V),PRESENTLY AT KURNOOL TOWN AND DISTRICT -AP ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, (HOME DEPARTMENT) , SECRETARIAT AT AMRAVATHI GUNTUR DISTRICT . 2. THE SUPERINTENDED OF POLICE, KURNOOL DISTRICT AT KURNOOL. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, ATHMAKUR POLICE STATION KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order, or direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, declare the inaction of the respondent No.3 who did not taking any action to investigate, arrest and filing the final report in FIR No. 12 of 2017 Dated. 20-1-2017 on the file of SHO Athmakur police station is illegal improper and violating of natural justice to get speedy justice Consequently directing the respondents No. 2 and 3 to proceed further in FIR No. 12 of 2017 Dated. 20-1-2017 on the file of SHO Athmakur police station 2 by investigate, arrest and filing final report after trace out the case and arrest them as per law in and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents No. 2and 3 to proceed further in FIR No. 12 of 2017 Dated. 20-1- 2017 on the file of SHO Athmakur police station by investigate, arrest and filing final report after trace out the case and arrest them as per law pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. G L NARASIMHA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 16476/2018 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order, or direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, declare the inaction of the respondent No.3 who did not take any action to investigate, arrest and filing the final report in FIR No. 12 of 2017 Dated. 20-1-2017 on the file of SHO Athmakur police station is illegal improper and violating of natural justice to get speedy justice Consequently directing the respondents No. 2 and 3 to proceed further in FIR No. 12 of 2017 Dated. 20-1-2017 on the file of SHO Athmakur police station by investigate, arrest and filing final report after trace out the case and arrest them as per law in and to pass…” 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that the investigation is completed and charge sheet is filed in this matter. The petition is filed seeking a direction to finalize the investigation in FIR No. 12 of 2017 on the file of SHO, Atmakur Police Station. 3. None represented for the petitioner. 4. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 17.07.2025 UPS 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.16476 of 2018 Dated.17.07.2025 UPS 56