137 RAM GOPAL STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS CORAM: Present: HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral) 1. decision in CWP No.15621 State of Haryana and Ors.”, petition was identical. 2. of 1998 was disposed of by the Co 07.08.2024 wherein the State has mentioned that the relief had already been granted to the petitioners hence, the present writ petition has been rendered infructuous and the same may kindly be disposed of as such. 3. of the petitioner be also considered in light of the decision in CWP IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDI CWP-15057 Date of Decision : 21 RAM GOPAL VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI Mr. Sanjiv Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Anupal, Addl. A.G., Haryana. *** HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral) The present petition was adjourned decision in CWP No.15621 of 1998 titled State of Haryana and Ors.”, as the question of law raised in the present petition was identical. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that CWP No.15621 of 1998 was disposed of by the Co-ordinate Benc 07.08.2024 wherein the State has mentioned that the relief had already been granted to the petitioners hence, the present writ petition has been rendered infructuous and the same may kindly be disposed of as such. Learned counsel for the respondent of the petitioner be also considered in light of the decision in CWP IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 15057-2001 Date of Decision : 21-07-2025 ........Petitioner VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ........Respondent(s) HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI Advocate Ms. Anupal, Addl. A.G., Haryana. HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral) The present petition was adjourned sine die to await the of 1998 titled “Mange Ram Garg and ors. Vs. as the question of law raised in the present Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that CWP No.15621 ordinate Bench of this Court on 07.08.2024 wherein the State has mentioned that the relief had already been granted to the petitioners hence, the present writ petition has been rendered infructuous and the same may kindly be disposed of as such. Learned counsel for the respondent-Sate submits that the claim of the petitioner be also considered in light of the decision in CWP ........Respondent(s) HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI to await the “Mange Ram Garg and ors. Vs. as the question of law raised in the present Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that CWP No.15621 h of this Court on 07.08.2024 wherein the State has mentioned that the relief had already been granted to the petitioners hence, the present writ petition has been rendered that the claim of the petitioner be also considered in light of the decision in CWP SAPNA GOYAL 2025.07.23 17:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-15057-2001 -2- No.15621 of 1998 titled “Mange Ram Garg and ors. Vs. State of Haryana and Ors.”, wherein the petitioner had already been granted the relief and in case it is found that the claim of the petitioner here is also identical and he is similarly situated, if the said relief has not already been granted, the same will be extended to the petitioner within a period of eight weeks from the date of the receipt of certified copy of this order by passing an appropriate speaking order otherwise due reasons will be mentioned in the speaking order to be passed for not accepting the claim of the petitioner, which speaking order will be conveyed to the petitioner for his information and necessary action. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that keeping in view the statement of learned State counsel, the present petition may kindly be disposed of as having been not pressed any further. 5. Ordered accordingly. 21-07-2025 Sapna Goyal (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE NOTE: Whether speaking: YES Whether reportable: NO SAPNA GOYAL 2025.07.23 17:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document