[2025:RJ-JP:28389] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9247/2025 Ramesh S/o Asharam, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Udaipuria, Police Station Chhabra, District Baran, Rajasthan. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Chhabra, District Baran). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mukesh Pal Jadoun Mr. Anurag Chahar Mr. Harshit Kakani For Respondent(s) For Complainant(s) : : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP Mr. Manoj Kumar Avasthi Mr. Jagdish nagar HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 28/07/2025 1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.0011/2025 registered at Police Station-Chhipabarod, District-Baran for offences under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109(1), 333 and 189(2) of BNS. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor as well as counsel for the complainant and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the similarly situated co-accused-Sudama Kirad, Jitendra Pankaj @ Jeetu @ Gotiya, Fareed Urf Kalia, Sandeep Bairwa and Deva have already been enlarged on bail by this Court on 14.07.2025. It is further submitted that although allegation is that the injured sustained 28 injuries but none of these injuries were caused by a [2025:RJ-JP:28389] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-9247/2025] sharp-edged weapon. As per medical opinion, all the injuries were caused by blunt weapon. There is no medical opinion on record indicating that any of the injuries are dangerous to life. Counsel further submits that according to the medical report, there is no evidence of any injury on any vital organ and therefore, the injuries documented in the medical record cannot be considered life-threatening. The petitioner is behind the bars since 02.01.2025. The trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioners in further custody, hence the bail application of the petitioners may be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for the complainant have vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner-Ramesh S/o Asharam shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for his appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J sunita/14