Dommeti Krishna Veni, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,
WP/16826/2019 · 2025-09-14
B V L N Chakravarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 24975 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 24975 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010352542019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] MONDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI
WRIT PETITION NO: 16826/2019
Between:
1. DOMMETI KRISHNA VENI, W/O.SOMA SHANKARA RAO, R/O.H.NO.11-8-8/1, SESHAYYA METTA, III TOWN POLICE STATION, RAJAHMUNDRY URBAN, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, A.P.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P.
2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, KAKINADA, A.P.
3. THE TAHSILDAR, RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, A.P.
4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM III TOWN POLICE STATION, RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
5. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE/ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S):
2 Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.
JALAKAM SATHYA RAM Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.
GP FOR HOME (AP)
2. GP FOR REVENUE (AP)
The Court made the following:
3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI
WRIT PETITION No.16826 OF 2019
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief:
“….to issue a writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 4th respondent interfering into the law and liberty of the petitioner in carrying out her business on the instructions of 3rd respondent is illegal, arbitrary and in violation of the Fundamental Rights guaranteed by the Constitution of India consequently direct the respondents not to interfere into the business of the petitioner without due process of law and to pass…”
2. None appeared for the petitioner, though the matter is posted under the caption ‘for dismissal’. There was no representation for the petitioner today, as well as on the previous adjournments.
3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home is in attendance.
4. In that view of the matter, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed.
______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 15.09.2025 Pmk
4 18 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI
WRIT PETITION No:16826 OF 2019
Date: 15.09.2025
Pmk