Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 24974 (JHR)

MASRUL ALAM v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cr.A(DB)/1083/2025 · 2025-09-22

Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, Rongon Mukhopadhyay

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:29230-DB IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. A. (DB) No. 1083 of 2025 -------- Masrul Alam, age about 21 years, son of Aktar Alam, R/o village- Fulsahar P.O.-Sekhdighi, P.S.-Sagardighi, District-Murshidabad (West Bengal) ... ... Appellant Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Respondent ----- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA -------- For the Appellant : Md. Yasir Arafat, Advocate For the State : Ms. Kumari Rashmi, A.P.P. -------- Order No. 02/ Dated: 22nd September, 2025 Heard Md. Yasir Arafat, learned counsel for the appellant and Ms. Kumari Rashmi, learned A.P.P. appearing for the State. 2. This appeal is directed against the order dated 21.08.2025 passed by the learned District & Addl. Sessions Judge-VII-cum-Special Judge (Crime Against Women), Jamshedpur in B.P. No. 588 of 2025, arising out of Tatanagar Rail P.S. Case No. 68 of 2025, whereby and whereunder the prayer for bail of the appellant has been rejected. 3. It has been alleged that seven children were apprehended from the railway station and the appellant as well as two other accused persons were attributed to have been involved in human trafficking. 4. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant has been said to be taking away three children two of whom were major and one was minor to state of Orissa. Learned counsel submits that the appellant is the student of Bachelor of Science and is in custody since 20.07.2025. 5. Ms. Kumari Rashmi, learned A.P.P. appearing for the State has opposed the prayer for bail of the appellant. 6. Regard being had to the period of custody undergone by the appellant and the fact that the children have been recovered at the railway 2025:JHHC:29230-DB 2 Cr. A. (DB) No. 1083 of 2025 station, we while setting aside the order dated 21.08.2025 passed by the learned District & Addl. Sessions Judge-VII-cum-Special Judge (Crime Against Women), Jamshedpur in B.P. No. 588 of 2025, arising out of Tatanagar Rail P.S. Case No. 68 of 2025, direct the appellant to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Railway Magistrate, Jamshedpur. 7. Accordingly, this appeal stands allowed and disposed of. (Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J.) (Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, J.) 22.09.2025 Basant/Arpit