BABLUL HOQUE MAZUMDER AND ANR v. THE STATE BANK OF INDIA AND 6 ORS
WA/305/2025 · 2025-11-13
Michael Zothankhuma, Mitali Thakuria
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 24970 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 24970 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010209892025
2025:GAU- AS:15421-DB
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WA/305/2025 BABLUL HOQUE MAZUMDER AND ANR DIST. CACHAR 2: SAFIQUL HOQUE MAZUMDER BOTH ARE SONS OF LATE BADRUL HOQUE MAZUMDER R/O VILL. AND P.O. BARJATRAPUR P.S. BORKHOLA DIST. CACHAR ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE BANK OF INDIA AND 6 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE ASST. GENERAL MANAGER STRESSED ASSETS RECOVERY BRANCH, 2ND FLOOR, SIGNATURE SQUARE, MRD ROAD, BAMUNIMAIDAM, GUWAHATI, PIN 781021 2:THE CHIEF MANAGER THE STATE BANK OF INDIA SILCHAR BRANCH SILCHAR CACHAR PIN 788001 3:THE AUTHORISED OFFICER THE STATE BANK OF INDIA SILCHAR BRANCH SILCHAR CACHAR PIN 788001 4:THE DIST. COMMISSIONER
Page No.# 2/3 CACHAR (REVENUE SETTLEMENT BRANCH) SILCHAR CACHAR ASSAM.
5:THE ASSTT. SETTLEMENT OFFICER KATIGORAH REVENUE CIRCLE CACHAR ASSAM.
6:SIRAJUL HOQUE MAZUMDER PROPRIETOR OF M/S SIRAJ GODOWN S/O LATE BADRUL HOQUE MAZUMDER R/O VILL. AND P.O. BARJATRAPUR P.S. BORKHOLA DIST. CACHAR ASSAM PIN 788110 7:MUNIM HASSAN RAJBORBHUIYA S/O LATE JALAL AHMED RAJBORBHUIYA VILL. BORJATRAPUR P.S. BORKHOLA DIST. CACHAR ASSAM PIN 78811 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR H R A CHOUDHURY, MS S DAS,MR. R A CHOUDHURY,MR F U BARBHUIYA Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM,
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MITALI THAKURIA
ORDER Date : 14/11/2025 (Michael Zothankhuma, J) Mr. H.R. A. Choudhury, learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. F.U. Borbhuiya,
learned counsel for the appellants submits that he would like to withdraw the appeal
Page No.# 3/3 and press the Writ Petition pending before the learned Single Judge, for early disposal. Mr. P. Saikia, learned counsel appears for the State Government. In view of the prayer made by the appellants’ counsel, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant