AKBAR MUSTAK SHAIKH v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
BA/4495/2025 · 2026-07-02
Shri Shyam C Chandak
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2497 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2497 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
H.C.SHIV 12.ba4495.25.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.4495 OF 2025 Akbar Mustak Shaikh ...Applicant V/s. State of Maharashtra & Anr. ...Respondents Ms. Afreen Shaikh with Nikhat Shaikh for the Applicant. Mr. S. S. Ghag, APP for Respondent No.1-State. Ms. Rachita Padwal i/b Saziya Mukadam for Respondent No.2. Mr. Subhash Badak, API, RCF police station present.
CORAM : SHYAM C. CHANDAK, J.
DATED : 2nd JULY, 2026 P.C. :-
1. Ms.Padwal, learned Counsel for Respondent No.2 states that today the victim and the informant/mother of the victim are present before the trial Court to tender their evidence.
2. Mr.Ghag, learned APP, on instructions from Mr.Subhash Badak, API, RCF police station states that, in this case the prosecution will examine 6 to 7 witnesses and conclude the trial within a period of one year from today.
3. In view thereof, Ms.Shaikh, learned Counsel for the Applicant, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the Application with liberty to renew the prayer for bail before the trial Court, if the case is not concluded within one year.
4. Leave and liberty is granted.
HEMANT CHANDERSEN SHIV Digitally signed by HEMANT CHANDERSEN SHIV Date: 2026.07.02 19:17:02 +0300
H.C.SHIV 12.ba4495.25.doc
5. Application stands disposed of as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty.
6. It is clarified that aforesaid Application is not heard on merits.
(SHYAM C. CHANDAK, J.)