[2025:RJ-JP:29153] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9289/2025 Sonu Chauhan Son Of Om Prakash Chauhan, Aged About 31 Years, Resident Of Near Vinod Press, Mohalla, Akherpura, Police Station Kotwali Alwar, District Alwar (Raj.) ( At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Central Jail Alwar) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Gurvindra Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 31/07/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.14/2025 registered at Police Station Shivaji Park, District Alwar (Rajasthan) for the offences punishable under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 189(2), 352 & 304(2) of BNS. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Counsel submits that alleged incident took place in the spur of moment. Counsel submits that grievous injuries sustained to the injured is on the non-vital part of the body. Counsel further submits that charge-sheet has been filed in this matter. Petitioner is in custody since 22.04.2025 and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion. Further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. [2025:RJ-JP:29153] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-9289/2025] 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner. He submits that petitioner is habitual offender as ten other cases of almost similar nature have been registered against him. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, as also the fact that grievous injuries sustained to the injured are on non-vital part of the body; charge-sheet has been filed in this matter; period of custody, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it fit and proper to allow this bail application. 6. The bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner Sonu Chauhan Son Of Om Prakash Chauhan shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and he shall mark his presence in first and third week of every month in the concerned police station. 8. If any breach of these conditions is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the trial [2025:RJ-JP:29153] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-9289/2025] court to cancel the bail granted to him by this Court. 9. Concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register recording the attendance of the petitioner. In case the petitioner fails to mark his presence in the concerned police station, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to the concerned Court in this regard. 10. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J LALIT MOHAN /396