- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:693 RSA No. 691 of 2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.NATARAJAN REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 691 OF 2016 (DEC) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. MAMTAZ BEGUM W/O LATE SRI C.N. NISSAR AHMED AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS. 2. SMT. NASRUM BEGUM D/O. LATE. SRI. C N NISSAR AHMED AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS. R/AT AMEER JAN ROAD, GUNDLUPET CHAMARAJANAGAR DISTRICT – 571 111. 3. SMT. C N NOOR FATHIMA D/O. LATE. SRI. C N NISAR AHMED AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS. 4. SMT. NOOR AYESHA D/O LATE SRI. C N NISAR AHMED AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS. 5. SRI NOOR AHMED S/O LATE SRI C.N. NISAR AHMED AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS. 6. SRI HABEEB-UR-REHAMAN S/O LATE SRI C.N. NISAR AHMED AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS. 7. SRI ABDULLA S/O LATE SRI C.N. NISSAR AHMED AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS. 8. SRI ABDUL RAHIM S/O LATE SRI C.N. NISSAR AHMED AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS. Digitally signed by NANDINI MS Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:693 RSA No. 691 of 2016 9. SRI ATEEQ-UR- REHMAN S/O LATE SRI C.N. NISSAR AHMED AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS. 10. SRI ABDUL RAZAK S/O LATE SRI C.N. NISSAR AHMED AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS. APPELLATNS 1, 3 TO 10 ARE R/O DEVANGA, 2ND CROSS CHAMARAJANAGAR CITY CHAMARAJANAGAR DISTRICT – 571 313. …APPELLANTS AND: 1. SMT. NUSRATH AZMATH D/O. LATE. SRI. ANWAR PASHA, AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS. 2. SRI KURSHID ANWAR S/O LATE SRI ANWAR PASHA AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS. 3. SRI KUMAR ANWAR S/O LATE. SRI. ANWAR PASHA AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS. 4. SRI KAISAR ANWAR S/O LATE SRI ANWAR PASHA AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS. 5. SRI KHIZAR ANWAR S/O LATE SRI ANWAR PASHA AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS. THE RESPONDENTS 1 TO 5 ARE R/AT ANWAR PASHA BUILDING GUNDLUPET CIRCLE, CHAMARAJANAGAR CHAMARAJANAGAR DISTRICT – 571 313. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:693 RSA No. 691 of 2016 6. SMT. ASMA APSAR W/O LATE SRI APSAR ANWAR AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS. 7. SRI YOUNUS ANWAR W/O LATE SRI APSAR ANWAR AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS. 8. SRI ROMAAN ANWAR S/O LATE SRI APSAR ANWAR AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS. 9. SRI FARHAZ ANWAR S/O LATE SRI APSAR ANWAR AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS. RESPONDENTS 6 TO 9 ARE R/AT HANUMANTHANAGAR BANNIMANTAPA-C-LAYOUT MYSORE - 570 001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI RAGHUNATH M.D, ADV., FOR C/R -8; SRI M.L.DAYANANDA KUMAR, ADV., FOR R-1 TO R-6, R-7 & R-9) THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 03.03.2016 PASSED IN RA NO.21/2013 ON THE FILE OF THE PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, CHAMARAJANAGAR, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 27.04.2013 PASSED IN OS NO.64/2004 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM., CHAMARAJANAGAR. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.NATARAJAN ORAL JUDGMENT 1. Memo for retirement is filed by learned counsel for the appellants on the ground that he has issued notice to the - 4 - NC: 2025:KHC:693 RSA No. 691 of 2016 appellants seeking instructions, but the appellants have not shown any interest. 2. The suit filed by the appellants/plaintiffs seeking direction to the defendants to vacate and deliver vacant possession of B Suit Schedule Property came to be dismissed which was upheld by the First Appellate Court. Hence, appellants are before this Court in this Second Appeal. During the pendency of the appeal, appellants are said to have sold the property to third party on 25.03.2024 and a copy of the Sale Deed is also produced by learned counsel for the respondents on the last date of hearing before this Court. 3. The submission of learned counsel is placed on record. 4. Learned counsel for the appellants is permitted to retire from the case. Office to show the name of appellants in the cause title. 5. In view of the appellants/plaintiffs having sold the property, they have lost interest over the property. Since the Courts below have dismissed the suit filed by the appellants/plaintiffs, the present appeal has rendered infructuous. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (K.NATARAJAN) JUDGE DN