Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:JHHC:19674
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cont. Case (Civil) No. 975 of 2024 ----- Bhaduri Bouri, S/o Mangal Bouri, R/o Village-Sibabudih, P.O.- Mahal, P.S.-Chandankyari, District-Bokaro
.......... Petitioner -Versus-
1. The State of Jharkhand
2. Sri Dharmendra Mittal, General Manager, East Jharia Area, M/S Bharat Coking Coal Ltd., Bhowra (S) Colliery, Bhowra, Dhanbad
.......... Opp. Parties -----
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR ----- For the Petitioner : Mr. Avishek Chandra, Advocate For the State : Mr. Saurav Mahto, A.C. to G.P.-I For O.P. No. 2 : Mr. Preetam Mondal, A.C. to
Mr. Amit Kr. Das, Advocate
-----
Order No.06
Date: 18.07.2025
1. The present contempt case has been filed for initiating contempt proceeding against the opposite party no. 2 for his wilful and deliberate disobedience of the order dated 26.02.2024 passed in W.P. (S) No. 3154 of 2021.
2. Mr. Preetam Mondal, learned A.C. to Mr. Amit Kumar Das, Advocate, appearing on behalf of the opposite party no. 2 refers to the order dated 07.01.2025 passed by the opposite party no. 2 (Annexure-A to the show cause affidavit dated 08.01.2025) and submits that the petitioner’s claim for appointment of his son on the ground that he is medically unfit has been considered and rejected. It is thus submitted that the aforesaid order of this Court has been complied.
3. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering that a speaking order dated 07.01.2025 has
2025:JHHC:19674
2
already been passed by the opposite party no. 2, there is no need to further proceed in the matter. The contempt proceeding as against the opposite party no. 2 is hereby dropped.
4. The present contempt case stands disposed of.
5. The petitioner is, however, at liberty to take appropriate recourse as available under law against the order dated
07.01.2025. (Rajesh Shankar, J.) Vikas/