DILIP KALITA AND ANR v. BHASKAR JYOTI SARMAH AND ANR
Cont.Cas(C)/315/2025 · 2025-12-09
Devashis Baruah
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 24967 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 24967 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010122412025
2025:GAU-AS:17120
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/315/2025 DILIP KALITA AND ANR SON OF LATE KANORAM KALITA AND RESIDING AT DIVINE TOWER, A.T.
ROAD, BHARALUMUKH, SANTIPUR BUS STAND, GUWAHATI-781009, DISTRICT- KAMRUP (METRO), ASSAM 2: DIPAK KALITA SON OF LATE KANORAM KALITA AND RESIDING AT DIVINE TOWER A.T. ROAD BHARALUMUKH SANTIPUR BUS STAND GUWAHATI-781009 DISTRICT- KAMRUP (METRO) ASSA VERSUS BHASKAR JYOTI SARMAH AND ANR THE CHIEF ENGINEER, WATER RESOURCE DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF ASSAM, CHANDMARI, GUWAHATI-781003 2:A M MAZUMDAR THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER GUWAHATI WEST W R DIVISION M G ROAD BHARALUMUKH GUWAHATI-78100 For the Petitioner(s) : Ms. K. Bharali, Advocate
For the Respondent(s) : Ms. R. Deka, Advocate
Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH ORDER Date : 10.12.2025
This is an application filed alleging willful and deliberate violation to the order passed by this Court dated 14.12.2023 in WP(C) No.6054/2022.
2. This Court has duly taken note of the affidavit so filed by the Respondent No.1 and more particularly the contents of paragraph Nos. 6 and 7 and Annexures 1 and 2 enclosed to the said affidavit.
3. From a perusal of the said affidavit, it therefore appears that the Respondent Authorities have taken due steps for compliance and have also acted in compliance with the order passed by this Court.
4. Considering the above, this Court therefore drops the instant contempt proceedings.
5. The dropping of the instant contempt application however shall not prejudice the claim of the Petitioners which is put in the chronological list enclosed as Annexure-2 to the affidavit-in-opposition filed by the Respondent No.1.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant