APHC010352322020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 23460/2020 Between: 1. GADDE BALA RANGA,, S/O VENKATESWARLU, AGED 40 YEARS, OCC COOLI WORK, DOOR NO.4-7-58, BACKSIDE MUNICIPAL PARK, KORITEPADU, GUNTUR. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR URBAN, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, ARUNDELPET POLICE STATION, ARUNDELPET, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. SAYYAD ALLABHAKSHU, S/O RASOOL, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O. FLAT NO.201, MAHENDRA ENCLAVE APARTMENT, 4TH LANE, SVN COLONY, GUJJANAGUNDLA, GUNTUR. 5. NALLURI KOTESWARA RAO, S/O BUTCHAIAH, AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O. DOOR NO.41-21-56/9, 2ND LANE, KRISHNA NAGAR, GUNTUR. 6. MARRI SURESH BABU, S/O SINGARAO, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O. DOOR NO.26-33-16, 7TH LANE, A.T. AGRAHARAM, GUNTUR. 7. NUWULA SRINIVASA RAO, S/O LAKSHMI NARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O. 1/4, 1ST LANE, VIDYA NAGAR, GUNTUR. 8. YARLAGADDA RAVI, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, OCC ADVOCATE, R/O.DOOR NO., G.M.C.NO.229, 3RD LANE, RAJENDRA NAGAR, GUNTUR. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. N V R AMARNATH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. VENKATESWARA RAO GUDAPATI 2 The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 2 and 3 police in not registering the FIR basing on the complaint made by the petitioner dated 07.09.2020 against the accused is illegal arbitrary and in violation of the law and procedure as contemplated under the law and in violation of Article 14 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 3rd respondent police to register a crime basing on the complaint dated 07.09.2020 given by the petitioner.” 2. Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that the disputes between the parties are purely civil in nature. 3. For ready reference, the written instructions are extracted hereunder: “It is further submit that basing on the grievance petition of petitioner endorsed from Supdt., of Police, Guntur Urban Dist., the under signed enquired the matter and as it is purely civil issue informing the petitioner to approach the Hon’ble Civil Court against concerned if any have written/oral agreement.” 4. In that view, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the Petitioner is at liberty to work out his remedies before appropriate forum in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:02.09.2025 ASR 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.23460 of 2020 Dt.02.09.2025 Asr