MANVEER SINGH @ MUNNA RAILI AND 8 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
A227/2179/2025 · 2025-03-04
Saurabh Srivastava
Public Interest Litigationbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 24963 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 24963 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:31728 Court No. - 79 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 2179 of 2025 Petitioner :- Manveer Singh @ Munna Raili And 8 Others Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Shashi Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Saurabh Srivastava,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The instant petition has been preferred with following prayers:-
"a. to issue an order or direction setting aside the impugned order dated 16.01.2025 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge/Special Judge (Rape & POCSO Act)-I, Etah in Criminal Revision no. 205/2024 (Manveer Singh @ Munna Raili & 9 others vs. Satish Chandra & another); b. to issue an order or direction setting aside the impugned summoning order dated 14.06.2024 passed by learned Additional Civil Judge (S.D.), Etah in Complaint Case no. 23751/2023 under Section 147, 323, 427, 452, 504 IPC, Police Station Pilua, District Etah;"
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that present complaint case no. 23751/2023 is nothing but the counter blast of the FIR which has been registered at the behest of father of petitioner no. 7 wherein respondent no. 2 has been implicated as one of the co-accused. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner pressed all the grounds whatsoever has been taken through the instant petition through which, it has been apprised that there is hardly any attraction of sections in which the petitioners have been summoned and all these grounds have not been taken into consideration while passing the order dated 14.06.2024. Being aggrieved with order dated 14.06.2024, petitioners preferred revision which was also rejected vide order dated 16.01.2025 which has been challenged through the instant petition. 5. Learned AGA for the State vehemently opposed the prayer sought through the instant petition. 6. Be that as it may, no useful purpose shall be served by way of
giving time for exchange of counter and rejoinder affidavit and keeping the matter pending before this Court and as such, without interfering into the merits of the matter, if there is no other legal impediment, learned Court of Additional Civil Judge (S.D.), Etah/concerned court is hereby directed to expedite and finalize the proceedings of Complaint Case no.
23751 of 2023 under section 147, 323, 427, 452, 504 IPC, Police Station- Pilua, District- Etah, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of 12 months from the date of presentation of certified copy of this order before him without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties, but after giving full opportunity of hearing to both sides. 7. It is also directed to the parties that no unnecessary adjournment shall be sought unless the same is unavoidable and both the parties are directed to cooperate with the learned court concerned for achieving the directions as made above. 8. However, it is made clear that till the disposal of the above mentioned complaint case no.23751 of 2023 no coercive action shall be initiated against the petitioners. 9. The instant petition is hereby disposed of accordingly. Order Date :- 5.3.2025 Shaswat Digitally signed by :- SHASWAT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad