- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:371 RFA No. 1151 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1151 OF 2023 (DEC/INJ) BETWEEN: SMT. K.SUNITHA W/O H.A.RAVIKUMAR, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, RESIDENT OF HUNSUR VILLAGE, B.K.HALLI POST, JALA HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK, BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. JAYARAJ.D.S., ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: 1. 1(a) SRI D.VENKATESH SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LR'S, SMT. SUNANADAMMA, W/O LATE D.VENKATESH, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, 2(b) SMT. MAHALAKSHMI D/O LATE D.VENKATESH, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, 2(c) SRI SRINIVAS S/O LATE D.VENKATESH, ALL ARE RESIDING AT NO.275/1, RAMA MANDIRA ROAD, KODIGEHALLI, SAHAKARANAGAR POST, BANGALORE-560 092. Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:371 RFA No. 1151 of 2023 4. SRI K.R.RAJANNA S/O LATE G.RAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.1293, KODIGEHALLI, BANGALORE-560 092. …RESPONDENTS THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF THE CPC, 1908. THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER When the case is called, the appellant is not represented. When the case is listed and called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the appeal was listed before Registrar (P & H) and also before the Court on several dates and sufficient time was granted to comply with the office objections. Despite granting time, office objections are not complied with as of today. The appeal is listed today for orders regarding non- compliance of office objections for the sixth time. A perusal of the entire order sheet reveals that despite giving sufficient time, the office objections are not complied with. Furthermore, - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:371 RFA No. 1151 of 2023 the appeal is filed in the year 2023. Now we are in the month of January 2025. The appeal is pending for almost two years. As already noted above, when the case is called, the appellant is not represented. It appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Hence, the Regular First Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution and also for non- compliance of office objections. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 2 Sl No.: 44