-1- C.M.P. No. 801 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI C.M.P. No. 801 of 2024 Pawan Kumar Singh, aged about 43 years, son of Shri Birender Singh, Resident of Village- Maheshpur Colliery, P.O. Madhuban, P.S. Madhuban, District- Dhanbad (Jharkhand) presently residing at Neelanchal Colony, P.O. Saraidhela, P.S. Saraidhela, District- Dhanbad … Petitioner -Versus- Anu Singh, aged about 44 years, Wife of Shri Pawan Kumar Singh, daughter of Vimal Singh, Resident of Neelanchal Colony, P.O. Saraidhela, P.S. Saraidhela, District- Dhanbad presently residing at Village- Semrav, P.O. Semrav, P.S. Charpokhri, District- Bhojpur (Bihar) … Opposite Party ----- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI ----- For the Petitioner : Mr. Sumit Prakash, Advocate For the Opposite Party : Mr. Hemant Kumar Shikarwar, Advocate ----- 04/03.03.2025 Heard Mr. Sumit Prakash, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Hemant Kumar Shikarwar, learned counsel for the sole opposite party. 2. This petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India praying therein to quash the order dated 04.07.2024 passed by the learned Additional Principal Judge, Additional Family Court No.2, Dhanbad in Original Suit Case No.598/2020, whereby, the petition filed by the petitioner for the DNA Test (Paternity Test) has been rejected. 3. Mr. Sumit Prakash, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petition filed for DNA Test of the minor child has been wrongly rejected by the learned Court and in view of that, the impugned order may kindly be quashed. 4. Mr. Hemant Kumar Shikarwar, learned counsel for the sole opposite party submits that DNA Test of the minor child was already made earlier and second petition was filed by the petitioner for the same test and in view of that, the learned Court has rightly rejected the said petition. -2- C.M.P. No. 801 of 2024 5. DNA Test of the minor child was already conducted earlier and report of the same has also been annexed with the record of the learned Court and in view of that, the second petition filed for the DNA Test has been rightly rejected by the learned Court. 6. In view of the above, there is no illegality in the impugned order and, as such, this petition is dismissed. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Ajay/