Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2496 (KAR)

KONKAN RAILWAY CORPORATION LTD v. SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITON OFFICER

WP/102178/2025 · 2026-08-25

M Nagaprasanna

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:14645 WP No. 102178 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 102178 OF 2025 (LA-RES) BETWEEN: KONKAN RAILWAY CORPORATION LTD., A CORPORATION INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956, HAVING A REGISTERED OFFICE AT BELAPUR BHAVAN, SECTOR 11, CBD BELAPUR NAVI MUMBAI- 400614, REPRESENTED BY SENIOR REGIONAL ENGINEER, KONKAN RAILWAY CORPORATION LTD., KARWAR SHRI. B.S. NADAGE, S/O SURENDRA NADAGE, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, AT KARWAR. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. RAKESH M. BILKI, SRI. SURAJ NAIK, AND SRI. PRAVEEN KUMAR, ADVOCATES) AND: 1. SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITON OFFICER KONKAN RAILWAY AND ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, KARWAR, KARWAR SUB-DIVISION, AT KARWAR- 581301. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, UTTARA KANNADA DISTRICT, OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, ATKARWAR- 581301. SHRI MAHABALESHWAR YASHWANT NAIK BY LRS RAKESH S HARIHAR Digitally signed by RAKESH S HARIHAR Date: 2025.10.31 06:27:47 +0000 - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:14645 WP No. 102178 of 2025 3. SMT. MANJULA MAHABALESHWAR NAIK, AGED: MAJOR, 4. SHRI. PREMANANDA MAHABALESHWARA NAIK, AGED: MAJOR, 5. SHRI. DINESH MAHABALESHWARA NAIK, AGED: MAJOR, 6. SHRI. GAJANANA MAHABALESHWARA NAIK, AGED: MAJOR, ALL ARE R/O: TORIEBAGH VILLAGE, KARWAR- 581301. …RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA IS PRAYING TO DECLARING THAT THE IMPUGNED AWARD DATED.22.03.2022 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1 IN ‘NO. BHUSWA.KR- VIVA.28(A)-70/2012-13 VIDE ANNEXURE-A IS VITIATED AND NON-EST AND IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY AND ETC., THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA) This Court, by order dated 22.09.2025, had passed the following direction: “1. Three weeks’ time is granted to comply with the office objections. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:14645 WP No. 102178 of 2025 2. If the office objections are not complied with by 16.10.2025, re-list on 29.10.2025 for dismissal under the caption ‘dismissal’.” 2. Despite the directions issued by this Court, the office objections have not been complied with till date. Accordingly, the petition stands rejected for non-compliance of the office objections. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE KGK/CT-GTB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 60