[2025:RJ-JP:21207-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10503/2021 1. Prahlad Barwar S/o Shri Moharu Ram, Aged About 42 Years, Resident Of Ward No. 1, Bus Stand Ke Pass, Mandha (Surera), Tehsil- Dantaramgarh, District Sikar (Raj.) 2. Om Prakash Achari S/o Shri Girdhari Lal, Aged About 39 Years, Resident Of Mandha Surera, Tehsil- Dantaramgarh, District Sikar (Raj.) 3. Hansraj Balai S/o Shri Chhigan Lal, Aged About 27 Years, Resident Of Ward No. 1, Mandha (Surera), Tehsil- Dantaramgarh, District Sikar (Raj.) 4. Bhanwar Lal Verma S/o Shri Uda Ram, Aged About 55 Years, Resident Of Ward No. 1, Mandha (Surera), Tehsil- Dantaramgarh, District Sikar (Raj.) ----Petitioners Versus 1. Union Of India, Through Secretary, Ministry Of Commerce And Industry, Udyog Bhawan, Rajpath Area, New Delhi- 110011 2. Petroleum And Explosive Safety Organization (Peso), Through Joint Chief Controller Of Explosives, North Circle Hall No. 502 And 507 Level 5, Block Ii, Old C.g.o. Complex, Nh-4, Faridabad-121001. 3. Deputy Chief Controller Of Explosives, Peso, Amrapali Circle, Near Power House, Vaishali Nagar Jaipur. 4. District Collector, Sikar (Raj.). 5. Sub-Divisional Officer (Sdo), Dataramgarh, District Sikar (Rajasthan). 6. Superintendent Of Police (S.p.), Rajasthan Police, Sikar (Rajasthan). 7. M/s Shri Khatu Shyam Minerals, Through Its Partner Rajendra Kumar, Flat No. 101, B-25, Devi Chiranjeev Colony, Gopalpura, Jaipur, (Rajasthan). ----Respondents [2025:RJ-JP:21207-DB] (2 of 2) [CW-10503/2021] For Petitioner(s) : Dr. Shivendra Singh Rathore. For Respondent(s) : Mr. R.D. Rastogi, Additional Solicitor General assisted by Mr. Devesh Yadav & Mr. Chinmay Sharma. Mr. Bhuwnesh Sharma, AAG with Ms. Sunita Meena. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 20/05/2025 Learned Additional Solicitor General appearing on behalf of the respondents No.1 to 3 submits that the petitioner is aggrieved by the explosive license granted in favour of the respondent No.7. Learned counsel further submits that the period of said licenses have already been expired on 31.03.2025 (Annexure-9). In view of the relevant document (Annexure-9) as well as the statement made by the Additional Solicitor General, counsel for the petitioners wants to withdraw this writ petition at this stage with liberty to file fresh, if need so arises. In that view of the matter, this writ petition is dismissed with liberty as prayed for. (ANAND SHARMA),J (INDERJEET SINGH),J MG/99