Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 24955 (PAT)

Raj Singh Yadav @ Raj Singh @ Tinku Yadav v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./16603/2025 · 2025-04-16

Prabhat Kumar Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16603 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-278 Year-2024 Thana- CHAUSA District- Madhepura ====================================================== Raj Singh Yadav @ Raj Singh @ Tinku Yadav Son of Nakul Prasad Yadav @ Nakul Yadav Resident of Village - Fulaut Purvi, Ward No. 08, P.S. - Chousa, District - Madhepura ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Praveen Kumar Agrawal , Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Pranav Kumar , APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 16-04-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State . 2. Petitioner apprehends arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under section 191 ( 2 ), 191 (3) , 190, 126 ( 2 ), 115 (2 ), 109 (1) , 303 ( 2 ), 324 ( 4 ) and 3(5) of BNS and 27 of Arms Act. 3 . As per the prosecution case , on the alleged date and time of occurrence , this petitioner along with other co- accused persons armed variously assaulted informant with lathi and iron rod due to which he sustained injury . It is further alleged that accused persons also looted cash from him. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that allegation of assault is general and omnibus. Injury caused by Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16603 of 2025(2) dt.16-04-2025 2/2 this petitioner is simple in nature . 5 . However, learned counsel for the State opposed the bail petition and submitted that petitioner is named in the F.I.R., and there is specific allegation against him is that he along with othere co-accused persons brutally assaulted informant and petitioner has got 5 criminal antecedent. Considering the nature of accusation , criminal antecedent and gravity of offence , prayer for pre-arrest bail of the petitioner is rejected. Koushik/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T