-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Civil) No. 883 of 2024 Dayanand Thakur, aged about 54 years, son of Late Paras Nath Thakur, resident of Ward No. 28, Devi Haridas Road, Bilasi, Deoghar, P.O. & P.S. Deoghar, District Deoghar, Jharkhand, PIN-814112, (Jharkhand). ..... … Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand. 2. Mr. Uma Shankar Singh, age and father's name not known to the Petitioner, at present posted and working as the Principal Secretary, Human Resources Department, having its office at Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, District Ranchi, PIN- 834004 (Jharkhand). 3. Mr. Utkarsh Gupta, age and father's name not known to the Petitioner, at present posted and working as The Director of Secondary Education, Department of School Education and Literacy, Government of Jharkhand, having its office at Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, District Ranchi, PIN-834004 (Jharkhand). 4. Mr. Vishal Sagar, age and father's name not known to the Petitioner, at present posted and working as Deputy Commissioner. Deoghar, having its office at District Collectorate, P.O. & P.S. Deoghar, District Deoghar, Jharkhand. 5. Mr. Krishn Gopal Jha, age and father's name not known to the Petitioner, at present posted and working as Regional Deputy Director of Education, Santhan Pargana Division, Dumka, having its office at District Dumka, P.O. & P.S. Dumka, District Dumka, Jharkhand. 6. Mr. Vinod Kumar, age and father's name not known to the Petitioner, at present posted and working as District Education Officer, Deoghar, having its office at District Collectorate, P.O. & P.S. Deoghar, District Deoghar, Jharkhand ..... … Opposite Parties -------- CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Chaitanya Vijay, Advocate. : Ms. Sanya Kumari, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Vineet Prakash, A.C. to S.C.-IV. ------ 07/ 14.02.2025 Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned -2- counsel appearing for the opposite parties jointly submit that the order of the writ court has been complied with. 2. In view of their such submission, the contempt proceeding is dropped and the petition is disposed of. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Amitesh/-