Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2495 (RAJ)

AJAY KUMAR SAMARIA S/O SHRI PUKHRAJ SAMARIA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/498/2025 · 2025-02-27

Praveer Bhatnagar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:8693] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.16483/2024 Sunil S/o Narpatram Gurjar, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Modasarbad, Deedwana, Police Station Deedwana, District Deedwana, Kuchaman (Raj.) (Presently Confined At Central Jail Ajmer). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 498/2025 Ajay Kumar Samaria S/o Shri Pukhraj Samaria, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Fatehpuri Gate, Deedwana, Police Station Deedwana, District Deedwana, Kuchaman (Raj.) (Presently Confined At Central Jail Ajmer). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sikander Ali Chopdar, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jitendra Singh Rathore, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 27/02/2025 1. These instant bail applications have been filed under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. on behalf of accused-petitioners. The accused- petitioners have been arrested in connection with FIR No.396/2024, registered at Police Station Madanganj, District Ajmer, for the offence(s) under Sections 19/54 of the Excise Act. [2025:RJ-JP:8693] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-16483/2024] 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that the accused- petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. It is contended that the accused-petitioners are in custody since 13.12.2024, the matter is exclusively triable by Magistrate and the trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, these bail applications of the accused-petitioners may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the grant of bail applications. 4. Heard and perused the material available on the record. 5. It is not desirable to express anything on the merits of the case, the accused-petitioners are in custody since 13.12.2024, the matter is exclusively triable by Magistrate and trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail. 6. Accordingly, these bail applications under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. are allowed and it is ordered that the accused- petitioners- 1. Sunil S/o Narpatram Gurjar and 2. Ajay Kumar Samaria S/o Shri Pukhraj Samaria, in connection with FIR No.396/2024, registered at Police Station Madanganj, District Ajmer, shall be enlarged on bail provided both of them furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for their appearance before the Court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Ashwani Kr Srivastava /-64-65