Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 24948 (KAR)

SRI B LINGARAJU v. SMT RADHIKA S

CRL.A/1141/2023 · 2025-02-11

Shivashankar Amarannavar

Criminal Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:5970 CRL.A No. 1141 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1141 OF 2023 BETWEEN: SRI. B. LINGARAJU S/O LATE BOOSIGOWDA AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS R/AT HIREMARALLI VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI, PANDAVAPURA TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT-571 434 …APPELLANT (BY SRI. ANIL KUMAR H.S, ADVOCATE – [ABSENT]) AND: SMT. RADHIKA S AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS TECHNICIAN-1, PLANNING SECTION RAILWAY CENTRAL WORKSHOP MANDHAVADI ROAD ASHOKPURAM, MYSORE-570 008 …RESPONDENT THIS CRL.A IS FILED U/S 397 R/W 401 CR.PC PRAYING TO ALLOW THIS RP AND SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT DATED 27.02.2023 PASSED IN CRL.A.NO.5048/2021 ON THE FILE OF THE III ADDL.DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE MANDYA SITTING AT SRIRANGAPATNA SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND THE SENTENCE DATED 27.11.2021 PASSED IN C.C.NO.868/2018 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C AT PANDAVAPURA AND THEREBY ALLOW THE COMPLAINT FILED BY THE COMPLAINANT/PETITIONER HEREIN AND CONVICT THE ACCUSED/RESPONDENT. Digitally signed by HEMAVATHY GANGABYRAPPA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:5970 CRL.A No. 1141 of 2023 THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR ORAL JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the appellant is absent. There is no representation on the appellant’s side. Learned counsel for the appellant was also absent on 06.11.2024 and on that day, the Court has passed the following order; “Learned counsel for the appellant is absent. No representation. The appeal is of the year 2023. Matter is listed for the fourth time for compliance of office objections. Still there is no progress in the matter. It appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Finally, as a last chance, a week's time is granted to comply with the office objections.” The matter is listed today for compliance of office objections for the fifth time. Considering the above, it appears that he appellant is not interested in prosecuting - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:5970 CRL.A No. 1141 of 2023 the appeal. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non compliance of office objections. Sd/- (SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR) JUDGE GH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 12