Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 24945 (MAD)

HAYATH BASHA v. STATE REP. BY

CRL OP/4498/2025 · 2025-02-19

G K Ilanthiraiyan

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Crl.O.P.No. 4498 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 19.02.2025 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Crl.O.P.No. 4498 of 2025 Hayath Basha .... Petitioner Vs 1.State Rep.By, The Inspector of Police, H-5, New Washermenpet Police Station, Chennai - 600 081. Crime No.329 Of 2022 .... Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to call for the records in Crl.M.P.No.15047 of 2024 in C.C.No.1353 of 2022 on the file of XV Metropolitan Magistrate, George Town, Chennai and set aside the order dated 12.12.2024. For Petitioner : Mr.G.Krishnamurthy For Respondent : Mr.A.Gopinath Government Advocate (Crl.Side) O R D E R This Criminal Original Petition has been filed challenging the order dated 12.12.2024 passed in Crl.M.P.No.15047 of 2024 by the XV Metropolitan Magistrate, George Town, Chennai, thereby dismissing the application filed under Section 348 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No. 4498 of 2025 Sanhita, 2023, to recall P.W.10. 2. Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side and perused the materials available on record. 3. The petitioner is an accused. The prosecution had examined all the witnesses, including the Investigating Officer, who was examined as P.W.10. It is seen that P.W.10 was already cross examined twice. After a period of seven months, once again the petitioner filed a petition to recall P.W.10 for further cross examination, that too when the matter was posted for arguments. It is not the case of the petitioner that P.W.10 was not cross examined. On the contrary, the record shows that P.W.10 was cross examined on two earlier occasions. Hence, it appears that the present application has been filed to protract the proceedings. 4. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner's counsel was unable to cross examination earlier and therefore, the petitioner sought for an opportunity to cross- examine P.W.10. 5. In view of the above, the Trial Court rightly dismissed https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No. 4498 of 2025 the application filed under Section 348 of BNSS to recall P.W.10. This Court finds no infirmity or illegality in the order dated 12.12.2024 passed in Crl.M.P.No.15047 of 2024 by the XV Metropolitan Magistrate, George Town, Chennai. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed. 19.02.2025 Index : Yes/No Neutral citation : Yes/No Speaking/non-speaking order Lpp To 1.The XV Metropolitan Magistrate, George Town, Chennai 2.The Inspector of Police, H-5, New Washermenpet Police Station, Chennai - 600 081. 3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras, Chennai. Page 3 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No. 4498 of 2025 G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J. Lpp Crl.O.P.No. 4498 of 2025 19.02.2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis