1Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.14348 of 2025 Date of decision: 04.09.2025 Monika Kumari. ...Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & Ors. ...Respondents. Coram: Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioner : Mr. Abhishek Dulta, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Vishwadeep Sharma, Additional Advocate General. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Notice. Mr. Vishwadeep Sharma, Additional Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. Petitioner is presently serving as a Trained Graduate Teacher (Non-Medical) at GHS Tepar, u/c GSSS Nau Pnau, District Mandi. She preferred representations to the respondents on 22.06.2025 (Annexure P-3) and 21.08.2025 (Annexure P-4), seeking her transfer to a station of her choice giving reasons and justification therefor. The petitioner’s grievance is that the aforesaid representations have not been decided by the respondents/competent authority till date. -2- 3. Looking to the nature of the grievance raised in this writ petition, it would in the interest of justice to direct Competent Authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representations (Annexure P-3 & P-4) of the petitioner in accordance with law and as per applicable policy within a period of four weeks from today. Ordered accordingly. The order so passed be also communicated to the petitioner. The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms. All pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, to also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua 4th September, 2025 Judge (Pardeep)