SATISH KAUSHIK SON OF SHRI CHUNNI LAL KAUSHIK v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLBC/142/2022 · 2025-02-05
Praveer Bhatnagar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 24941 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 24941 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:5055] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Bail Cancellation Application No. 142/2022 Satish Kaushik Son Of Shri Chunni Lal Kaushik, Aged About 54 Years, Resident Of Maswasi, P.s. And Teh. Kotkasim, Distt. Alwar (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.
2. Pawan Kumar @ Daga Son Of Shri Mahendra, aged about 30 years Resident Of Maswasi, Police Station And Tehsil Kotkasim, Distt. Alwar Raj. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rahul Tiwari For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR
Order 05/02/2025 It is informed by learned counsel for the petitioner that bail bonds of respondent No. 2 stands forfeited vide order dated 25.08.2021 as respondent No. 2 did not appear before the concerned court. It is contended that respondent No. 2 after forfeiture of bail bonds is still threatening the complainant, therefore the bail granted to the respondent No. 2 vide order dated 08.02.2021 may be cancelled. Heard and perused the material available on the record. The order-sheet of the court below dated 25.08.2021, clearly shows that the bail bonds furnished by respondent No. 2 stands forfeited as the respondent No. 2 did not appear before the
[2025:RJ-JP:5055] (2 of 2) [CRLBC-142/2022] concerned trial court, the impugned order itself has become infructuous as the bail bonds of the respondent No. 2 was forfeited by the court below, no case is made out for cancellation of bail. Accordingly, instant bail cancellation application stands
disposed of.
(PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J ashu /85