APHC010352272020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION Between: 1. BEELA PARVATHI, W/o Maheswara Rao, Aged about 60 years, Occ. House wife, Resident of Innispeta, Rajamahendravaram, East Godavari District. 1. THE STATE OF AP, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Department of H Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi. 2. The Superintendent of Police, West Godavari District at Eluru. 3. The Circle Inspector of Police, Polavaram Police Station, West Godavari District. 4. The Sub Inspector of Police, Polavaram Police Station, West District. 5. Dokala Butchiraju, S/o Late Appanna, Aged about 70 years, Occ. Agriculture, Resident of Kothapattiseema Village, Polavaram Mandal, West Godavari District. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 23414 OF 2020 1. BEELA PARVATHI, W/o Maheswara Rao, Aged about 60 years, Occ. House wife, Resident of Innispeta, Rajamahendravaram, East Godavari ...Petitioner AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Department of H Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi. 2. The Superintendent of Police, West Godavari District at Eluru. 3. The Circle Inspector of Police, Polavaram Police Station, West Godavari 4. The Sub Inspector of Police, Polavaram Police Station, West 5. Dokala Butchiraju, S/o Late Appanna, Aged about 70 years, Occ. Agriculture, Resident of Kothapattiseema Village, Polavaram Mandal, West IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 1. BEELA PARVATHI, W/o Maheswara Rao, Aged about 60 years, Occ. House wife, Resident of Innispeta, Rajamahendravaram, East Godavari ...Petitioner 1. THE STATE OF AP, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Department of Home, 3. The Circle Inspector of Police, Polavaram Police Station, West Godavari 4. The Sub Inspector of Police, Polavaram Police Station, West Godavari 5. Dokala Butchiraju, S/o Late Appanna, Aged about 70 years, Occ. Agriculture, Resident of Kothapattiseema Village, Polavaram Mandal, West 2 6. Dokala Rambabu, S/o Late Appanna, Aged about 60 years, Occ. Agriculture, Resident of Kothapattiseema Village, Polavaram Mandal, West Godavari District. 7. Dokala Simhachalam, S/o Late Appanna, Aged about 65 years, Occ. Agriculture, Resident of Kothapattiseema Village, Polavaram Mandal, West Godavari District. 8. Dokala Bangaraiah, S/o Late Appanna, Aged about 67 years, Occ. Agriculture, Resident of Kothapattiseema Village, Polavaram Mandal, West Godavari District. 9. Dokala Satyanarayana, S/o Late Appanna, Aged about 57 years, Occ. Agriculture, Resident of Kothapattiseema Village, Polavaram Mandal, West Godavari District. 10. Dokala Papa Rao, S/o Muthyalu, Aged about 55 years, Occ. Agriculture, Resident of Rajamahendravaraim Town and Mandal, East Godavari District. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to to issue a Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 3 and 4 in not entertaining the representation dated 06-12-2020 filed by the petitioner requesting to provide police protection for harvesting Paddy crop raised in an extent of Ac.6.15 cents in R.S.No.442, situated in Kothapattiseema village, Polavaram Mandal, West Godavari District for which denied to give protection on the ground that the civil cases are pending against each other is being illegal, arbitrary, unilateral, unjust and against procedure of Law and in violation of the principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents 3 and 4 to provide protection to harvest the paddy crop raised by the petitioner in an extent of Ac.6.15 cents in R.S.No.442, situated in Kothapattiseema village, Polavaram Mandal, West Godavari District and to 3 grant such other order or orders as this Honourable Court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. IA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 3 and 4 to provide protection to harvest the paddy crop raised by the petitioner in an extent of Ac.6.15 cents in R.S.No.442, situated in Kothapattiseema village, Polavaram Mandal, West Godavari District by entertaining the representation dated 06-12-2020 made by the petitioner, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition, and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: VUTUPALLI RAJANNA Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondents:K VENKATESH The Court made the following order: 4 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 23414 OF 2020 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to issue a Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 3 and 4 in not entertaining the representation dated 06-12-2020 filed by the petitioner requesting to provide police protection for harvesting Paddy crop raised in an extent of Ac.6.15 cents in R.S.No.442, situated in Kothapattiseema village, Polavaram Mandal, West Godavari District for which denied to give protection on the ground that the civil cases are pending against each other is being illegal, arbitrary, unilateral, unjust and against procedure of Law and in violation of the principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents 3 and 4 to provide protection to harvest the paddy crop raised by the petitioner in an extent of Ac.6.15 cents in R.S.No.442, situated in Kothapattiseema village, Polavaram Mandal, West Godavari District and to grant such other order or orders as this Honourable Court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case...” 2. When the matter was taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petition may be disposed of, since the relief has become infructuous in this matter. 3. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents is in attendance. 4. Recording the same, the Writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 03.09.2025 KKV 5 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 23414 OF 2020 Date: 03.09.2025 KKV