Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 24938 (HP)

MONIKA DEVI BAGGA AND OTHERS v. STATE OF HP AND ORS

CWP/14523/2025 · 2025-09-11

Sandeep Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.14523 of 2025 Date of Decision: 11.09.2025 _______________________________________________________ Smt. Monika Devi Bagga and Others …….Petitioners Versus State of H.P. and Others ….Respondents _______________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioner: M/s. Onkar Jairath, Anshul Jairath and Piyush Mehta, Advocates. For the Respondents: Mr. Rajan Kahol, Mr. Vishal Panwar and Mr. B.C. Verma, Additional Advocates General, with Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General, for State. ____________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral): Learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that case of the petitioner is squarely covered by the judgment dated 29.11.2024 passed by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in CWP No.1638 of 2024, titled Mohit Sharma and Another vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and Others. 2. Having perused the averments contained in the petition, especially relief clause vis-à-vis judgment dated 29.11.2024 passed by Coordinate Bench of this Court in Mohit Sharma’s case (supra), this Court finds that case of the petitioner is identical to the aforesaid case decided by Coordinate Bench of this Court. Vide aforesaid 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 judgment, this Court has already dealt with all the points raised in the instant petition and as such, respondents can be directed to decide the case of the petitioners in light of the aforesaid judgment rendered by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court. 3. Consequently, In view of the above, the directions contained in the aforesaid judgment rendered by Coordinate Bench of this Court in Mohit Sharma’s case (supra) are ordered to be made mutatis mutandis applicable in the present case for all intents and purposes. In the aforesaid terms, present petition is disposed of alongwith pending application(s), if any. p` (Sandeep Sharma), Judge September 11, 2025 (Rajeev Raturi)