APHC010352942018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 16296/2018 Between: 1. S. SRIDEVI,, W/O. G. RAVI, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, MICRO IRRIGATION AREA OFFICER, O/O. PROJECT DIRECTOR, AP MICRO IRRIGATION PROJECT, THATICHETTLAPALEM, SELIGRAMAPURAM, NH-16 ROAD, VISAKHAPATNAM - 530024 ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,AGRICULTURE/HORTICULTURE DEPARTMENT. SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI - 522 503 GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. THE COMMISSIONER, HORTICULTURE VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT . 3. THE CHAIRMAN CUM DISTRICT COLLECTOR, A.P. MICRO IRRIGATION PROJECT VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT 4. THE PROJECT DIRECTOR, A.P. MICRO IRRIGATION PROJECT, O/O. PROJECT DIRECTOR, APMIP THATICHETTLAPALEM, SALIGRAMAPURAM NH-16 ROAD, VISAKHAPATNAM 5. M/S INTIME SERVICES PVT LTD, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, PLOT NO. 27-A OPP. 'C' GATE PUBLIC SCHOOL SECTOR-10, MVP COLONY, VISAKHAPATNAM VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the proceedings Rc.No.APMIP/73/2015 dt.16-4-2018 issued by the 4th respondent in discontinuing petitioner from service as wholly illegal, arbitrary, violative of Articles 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India apart from being violative of principles of natural justice and 2 consequently declare that petitioner entitled to be continued in service as MIAO with all consequential benefits and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KIRTHI TEJA KONDAVEETI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR AGRICULTURE (AP) The Court made the following: ORDER: The instant Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioners seeking indulgence of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “ ... ....” 2. Learned counsel for respondent No.7 would submit that the interim passed by this Court on 11.12.2018 passed in IA No.1 of 2018 has been complied with and the Writ Petition may be disposed of. 3. The earlier Docket Proceedings would show that none represented for the Petitioners and the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption “For Dismissal”. 4. Despite the matter being listed under the caption “For dismissal”, none represented for the Petitioners today. 3 4. In that view, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 44779 of 2018 02.07.2025 Mjl /*