MG. PARTNER, SREE SREENIVASA ENTERPRISES, GUNTUR DISTRICT v. CHAIRMAN & MD., HINDUSTAN PETROLIUM CORP. LTD., MUMBAI & ANO
WP/19557/2013 · 2025-07-28
Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 24934 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 24934 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
APHC010352712013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] TUESDAY,THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 19557/2013 Between:
1. SREE SREENIVASA ENTERPRISES, GUNTUR DISTRICT, TILAK ROAD, TENALI- 522 202, GUNTUR DISTRICT, REP.BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER K.V.NARASIMHA RAO.
...PETITIONER AND
1. HINDUSTAN PETROLIUM CORP LTD MUMBAI ANO, REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR, 17, JAMSHEDJI TATA ROAD, MUMBAI
2. HINDUSTAN PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD, REP. BY ITS SENIOR REGIONAL MANAGER, AND DULY CONSTITUTED AUTHORITY, VIJAYAWADA RETAIL REGIONAL OFFICE, MANGALAGIRI ROAD,NEAR SAIBABA TEMPLE, TADEPALLI- 522 501, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. V V L N SARMA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. V R REDDY KOVVURI The Court made the following:
2
ORAL ORDER:
When this Writ Petition was listed on 10.07.2025, there was no representation on behalf of the Writ Petitioner, and the matter was directed to be posted under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Today also, there is no appearance on behalf of the Writ Petitioner.
2. This matter is of the year 2013 and, therefore, this Court is of the opinion that no useful purpose would be served by keeping it pending on the file of this Court inasmuch as the Writ Petitioner has not evinced any interest in prosecuting this Writ Petition.
3. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed for Non-prosecution. No order as to costs.
4. However, there shall be a direction to the Registry to preserve the record for a period of twelve (12) weeks from today in order to enable the parties to file an appropriate Application for Restoration, if the Writ Petitioner is of the opinion that the cause of action still survives.
5. If such Application is not filed within the fixed time, the Registry is at liberty to destroy the record four (04) weeks after the expiry of the said twelve (12) weeks period as per the procedure.
Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order.
______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J
Dt: 29.07.2025 Vns