Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:46579 RSA No. 743 of 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 743 OF 2020 (INJ) BETWEEN:
1.
M C JAYARAMU S/O LATE CHIKKEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS,
2. MAHESHA S/O LATE CHIKKEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS,
3. SOMASHEKARA S/O LATE CHIKKEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS,
ALL ARE RESIDENT OF MAYAPPANAHALLI VILLAGE, BASARALU HOBLI MANDYA TALUK - 577 501. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI.GNANESH.N.I., ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: SMT.JAYAMMA W/O NINGEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, RESIDENT OF MAYAPANNAHALLI VILLAGE, BASARALU HOBLI, MANDYA TALUK - 577 501. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. SYED AKBAR PASHA., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. MAHANTESH S HOSMATH., ADVOCATE)
Digitally signed by THEJAS KUMAR N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:46579 RSA No. 743 of 2020
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS LISTED FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER Though matter called twice, the appellants are not represented. When the case is listed and called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case. Sri.Syed Akbar Pasha., counsel on behalf of Sri.Mahantesh S.Hosmath., for the respondent has appeared in person. As could be seen from the appeal papers, the appeal is filed in 2020. Now we are in November, 2025. The appeal is pending from five years. As already noted above, though matter called twice, the appellants are not represented. It appears that the appellants are not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Hence, the Regular Second Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:46579 RSA No. 743 of 2020
Because of dismissal of the appeal, pending interlocutory applications if any are disposed of and interim direction if any stands discharged.
Sd/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 18