CHEEKATIMARLA VENKATA SUBBARAO v. CHEEKATIMARLA SARITHA
CRLRC/452/2020 · 2025-03-19
T Mallikarjuna Rao
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 24918 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 24918 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010352212020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3369] WEDNESDAY,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO I.A.Nos.1 and 2 of 2024 in CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 452/2020 Between: Cheekatimarla Venkata Subbarao ...PETITIONER AND Cheekatimarla Saritha and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. JANGAM VENKATA SIVA SAI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following COMMON ORDER:
1. I.A.No.1 of 2024 is filed by the petitioners, who are the respondents in the Revision, seeking to record the compromise entered between the petitioners and respondent in this Revision as per the terms of the compromise filed before Lok Adalat, SPSR Nellore and Award dated 29.07.2021 and dispose of the present Revision Case. 2. I.A.No.2 of 2024 is filed by the petitioners, who are the respondents in the Revision, seeking to grant permission to the petitioner No.1 herein to compromise the dispute in this Revision between the petitioner No.1 and the
2
respondent No.1 herein as per the terms of the compromise filed before the Lok Adalat SPSR Nellore and Award of Lok Adalat dated 29.07.2021. 3. The respondents in the Revision, who are the petitioners in DVC No.06 of 2014, filed a petition under Sections 18, 19, 20, 21, 22 and 23 of Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 before the Special Judicial Magistrate of First Class for Trial of Prohibition and Excise Offences, Nellore (for short, ‘the trial Court’), seeking the following reliefs: (a) direct the respondents to pay a sum of Rs.30,000/- per month to each of the petitioners towards the maintenance of petitioners for food clothing shelter and emergency medical needs. (b) Recovery of Dowry amount presented at the time of marriage Rs.5 lakhs. (c) To direct the 1st respondent to take the 1st petitioner to the marital fold at his residential house at Hyderabad and lead happy married life. (d) To direct all the respondents to pay a sum of Rs.20,00,000/- to the petitioner towards damages for spoiling the life of petitioners. (e) To direct the respondents to return the 1st petitioner’s gold jewellery of 65 sovereigns and 2nd petitioner’s gold jewellery of 10 sovereigns along with clothing and passports of the petitioners which were in unlawful possession of Cheekatimarla Ravi.
(f) To direct the 1st respondent to provide a sum of Rs.10,000/- towards rented house rent and for the payment of electricity bills per month and cost of the petition. 4. After considering the material as well as the evidence on record, the trial Court, partly allowed the petition by directing the 1st respondent to pay an amount of Rs.3500/- per month to each petitioners towards maintenance and also to pay an amount of Rs.2,00,000/- towards compensation. The 1st respondent was further directed to pay monthly maintenance of Rs.3500/- each shall be paid to the aggrieved persons on or before 10th of every succeeding month from the date of the order. The 1st respondent was directed to pay compensation amount in six monthly equal instalments commencing from September, 2017. The rest of the reliefs claimed by the aggrieved person were dismissed vide Order dated 31.08.2017 in DVC No.06 of 2014. Aggrieved by the Order, the 1st respondent/husband preferred an appeal in
3
Crl.A.No.358 of 2017 before the learned III Additional Sessions Judge, Nellore (for short, ‘the 1st appellate Court’). The learned 1st appellate Court after considering the material on record, dismissed the appeal vide Judgment dated 09.10.2020 in Crl.A.No.358 of 2017. Aggrieved by the impugned order, the petitioner/husband preferred the present Revision. 5. I have heard both sides and perused the material on record. 6. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, both parties in the Revision are present and they are identified by their learned counsel. The terms and conditions of compromise before the Lok Adalat, SPSR Nellore vide Lok Adalat Award dated 29.07.2021, are read over to the parties and they are admitted as true and correct. 7. It is submitted that parties to the proceedings have compromised the matter before the Lok Adalat, SPSR Nellore vide Lok Adalat Award dated 29.07.2021 and settled all the disputes between the parties. It seems that all the disputes including the present dispute covered in the Revision. 8.
In pursuance of the compromise terms made before the Lok Adalat, SPSR Nellore, the Revision Petitioner has executed a Registered Gift Deed in favour of Gowri Shankar/R.2, who is the son of Respondent No.1. When ascertained from both the parties, they informed the Court that the amounts have been paid towards settlement and they have no objection to give up the allegations made against the Revision Petitioner and the parties further agreed that they shall not make any allegations against each other in the future and forever. 9. On being satisfied with the terms and conditions of compromise made before the Lok Adalat, SPSR Nellore vide Lok Adalat Award dated 29.07.2021 and in view of the amicable settlement made by both parties in respect of present Criminal Revision Case is concerned, I.A.No.1 of 2024 and I.A.No.02 of 2024 are allowed consequently the Criminal Revision Case is disposed of
4
by setting aside the Judgment dated 09.10.2020 in Crl.A.No.358 of 2017 on the file of learned III Additional Sessions Judge, Nellore and consequently dismissed the Order dated 31.08.2017 in DVC No.06 of 2014 on the file of Judicial Magistrate of I Class for Trial of Prohibition and Excise Offences, Nellore. Consequently, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________________ JUSTICE T.MALLIKARJUNA RAO Date: 19.03.2025 MS
5
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO
I.A.Nos.1 and 2 of 2024 In/and Criminal Revision Case No.452 OF 2020 DATE: 19.03.2025
MS