TARVINDER SINGH ALIAS TARWINDER SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB
CRM-M/8210/2025 · 2025-04-03
Sanjiv Berry
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 24916 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 24916 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
231
CRM-M-8210-2025 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-8210-2025 Date of decision: 03.04.2025
TARVINDER SINGH ALIAS TARWINDER SINGH ….Petitioner
Versus STATE OF PUNJAB ....Respondent
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV BERRY Present:- Mr. Gursewak Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Rajinder Singh Bhatta, DAG Punjab. ..… SANJIV BERRY, J. (ORAL) By way of present petition filed under Section 482 BNSS, 2023, the petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in case FIR as under: - FIR No. Dated Sections Police Station 97 21.06.2024 420, 511 IPC Civil Lines, District Patiala.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in compliance to the order dated 19.03.2025, the petitioner has joined the investigation. 3. During the course of hearing on 19.03.2025, following order had been passed: -
“ Heard. After considering the rival contentions and perusing the record, it transpires that as per the allegations levelled in the FIR, the petitioner had tried to take loan by pledging Puneet Sharma 2025.04.05 10:11 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment
231
CRM-M-8210-2025 -2- some articles, claiming the same to be of gold, but on being found fake, he ran away. The case put forth by the petitioner is that his father was seriously ill and for the purpose of arranging funds for the treatment of his father, the petitioner had taken the gold jewellery lying in the house for mortgage and he was not aware about the genuineness thereof. Admittedly the petitioner is not having any criminal antecedents nor any payment has been made to him in the present case. Be it the case, without commenting on the merits of the case, the petitioner is hereby directed to join investigation within seven days from today and co-operate in the same. In the event of the arrest of the petitioner, he shall be released on interim bail on his furnishing personal/surety bonds to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer/Investigating Officer. He shall also abide by conditions as envisaged under Section 482(2) BNSS. List on 03.04.2025”
4. Learned State counsel on instructions received from ASI Suresh Kumar informs the Court that the petitioner has joined the investigation and is neither required for further investigation nor for any custodial interrogation. 5. Keeping in view the above submissions made by learned State counsel and the fact that the petitioner had joined the investigation consequent to the order dated 19.03.2025 passed by this Court, interim bail granted vide order dated 19.03.2025 is hereby confirmed, subject to conditions as envisaged under Section 482(2) of BNSS.
Further the petitioner is directed to join investigation as and when required in future by way of written notice for such purpose to be served by Investigating Officer of this case upon the petitioner; he will not tamper with the Puneet Sharma 2025.04.05 10:11 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment
231
CRM-M-8210-2025 -3- evidence nor will influence the witnesses and will not leave the country without prior permission of the Court. 6. The petition stands allowed. 7. It is made clear that anything contained hereinabove shall not be construed to be an expression of opinion on the merits of the case. (SANJIV BERRY) 03.04.2025 JUDGE puneet i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No ii) Whether reportable? Yes/No Puneet Sharma 2025.04.05 10:11 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment