APHC010351852018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY,THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 16371/2018 Between: 1. GAJULA ATCHIYAMMA, W/O MOHANA RAO, AGED 65 YEARS, OCC. HOUSE WIFE, R/O. DAMIREDDY PALLY VILLAGE, KADIYAM MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. SRINIVASA RAO GAJULA, S/O. MOHANA RAO, AGED 42 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. DAMIREDDY PALLY VILLAGE, KADIYAM MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE SATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS AT VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, EAST GODAVARI URBAN EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, RAJAHMUNDRY II TOWN POLICE STATION, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 4. PUNDARI KAKSHUDU SUNDRU, S/O. MDHUSUDHANA RAO, AGED 59 YEARS, OCC. MANAGER PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK, RAJAMAHENDHRAVARAM, R/O. KANURU VILLAGE, VIJAYAWADA, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. V SAI KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 3 The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer: “…..to issue a Writ or Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in not following the orders of this Honorable High Court passed in CRLP No. 3006 of 2018 Dated 19.03.2018 as well as the verdict passed by the Apex Court in Arnesh Kumar Vs State of Bihar reported in 2014 (2) ALT(Crl) 457(SC) while investigating the Case in FIR No. 24 of 2018 Dated. 25.01.2018 on the file of the 3rd respondent station as illegal, arbitrary, as well as abuse of power of Police and also contemptuous in nature consequentially direct the 3rd respondent to scrupulously follow the orders passed by this Honorable Court in CRLP No. 3006 of 2018 Dated 19.03.2018 as well as the Verdict of the Apex Court in Arnesh Kumar Vs State of Bihar, reported in 2014(2) ALT(Crl) 457(SC) while investigating the case in FIR No. 24 of 2018 Dated 25.01.2018 on the file of the 3rd respondent police station and to pass……” 2. Sri V.Sai Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that as per the instructions received from the party, they wanted to withdraw this Writ Petition. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents is in attendance. 4. Recording the submission made, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 15.07.2025 MH 4 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 35 WRIT PETITION NO: 16371/2018 Dt.15.07.2025 MH