[2025:RJ-JP:30353] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8826/2025 Mr. Azad Singh S/o Tarachand, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Gadli, Police Station Buhana, District Jhunjhunu, At Present Assistant Engineer, Avvnl (O. And M.), Chidava District Jhunjhunu. (Presently Confined In District Jail, Jhunjhunu). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9214/2025 Narendra Singh Shekhawat S/o Shri Shyam Singh Shekhawat, Aged About 55 Years, R/o Ward No. 06, Sultana, Police Thana Sultana, District Jhunjhunu, Presently Assistant Administrative Officer, Office Assistant Engineer Avvnl (O And M), Chidawa, Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan. (Accused In District Jail Jhunjhunu). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Aditya Khandelwal Mr. Ripu Daman Singh Naruka Mr. Ashu Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 01/08/2025 1. These bail applications have been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioners, who have been arrested in connection with FIR No.146/2025 registered at Police Station C.P.S. Jaipur, District ACB District for the offences under Section 7 of Prevention of Corruption (Amendment) Act, 1988 and Section 61(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (in short, ‘BNS’), 2023. [2025:RJ-JP:30353] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-8826/2025] 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioners that the accused-petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. It is submitted that false recovery of bribe amount of Rs.30,000/- has been shown from the petitioner Narendra Singh Shekhawat. It is submitted that trial will take considerable time in its conclusion. It is submitted that petitioners are in custody since 10.06.2025 and further custody of the petitioners would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the argument advanced by learned counsel for the petitioners as also considering the fact that petitioners are in custody since 10.06.2025 and trial will take time in its conclusion, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow these bail applications. 6. These bail applications are accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioners (1) Mr. Azad Singh S/o Tarachand, and (2) Narendra Singh Shekhawat S/o Shri Shyam Singh Shekhawat, shall be released on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the [2025:RJ-JP:30353] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-8826/2025] matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. The observations made hereinabove is only for the decision of these bail applications and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J CHARU SONI /286-287